


Dynamically Linked Global and Static Variables in Shared Libraries
Load-Time Dynamic Linking
When an application dynamically links to a module A with load-time linking, the operating system loads the DLL's code and data into the application's address space. The application has its own copy of A's global and static variables, loaded into its data segment.
Run-Time Dynamic Linking
With run-time dynamic linking, the application loads the DLL's code and data only when needed. The application does not get its own copies of A's global and static variables. Instead, it accesses them directly from the loaded DLL.
Visibility and Scope
In all cases, static variables are only visible within the module where they are defined. Global variables, however, have different visibility rules:
Windows:
- Extern global variables are not visible outside the defining module.
- To export a global variable, it must be declared with __declspec(dllexport) in the DLL and __declspec(dllimport) in the importing module.
Unix-like Systems:
- Extern global variables are visible and shared across all modules loaded during load-time dynamic linking.
Multiple Applications
If multiple applications use modules A and B, separate copies of their global and static variables are created for each application, even if they are in different processes.
DLL Access to Application Globals
DLLs do not have direct access to the global variables of the application they are linked to. In order to manipulate the application's global variables, the DLL must use exported functions provided by the application.
Conclusion
The behavior of global and static variables in dynamically linked shared libraries varies between Windows and Unix-like systems. Windows enforces strict separation of globals between modules, while Unix-like systems allow sharing of globals during load-time dynamic linking. In general, it is recommended to avoid using global variables when working with shared libraries.
The above is the detailed content of How Do Global and Static Variables Behave in Dynamically Linked Shared Libraries Across Different Operating Systems?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C is not dead, but has flourished in many key areas: 1) game development, 2) system programming, 3) high-performance computing, 4) browsers and network applications, C is still the mainstream choice, showing its strong vitality and application scenarios.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.

C code optimization can be achieved through the following strategies: 1. Manually manage memory for optimization use; 2. Write code that complies with compiler optimization rules; 3. Select appropriate algorithms and data structures; 4. Use inline functions to reduce call overhead; 5. Apply template metaprogramming to optimize at compile time; 6. Avoid unnecessary copying, use moving semantics and reference parameters; 7. Use const correctly to help compiler optimization; 8. Select appropriate data structures, such as std::vector.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.
