


Evaluating Differences in Go Pointers
In Go, pointers are essential for working with variables. However, understanding the nuances between different pointer types can be challenging. This article explores a specific scenario that showcases the distinctions between pointers and how they affect the output when using the default formatting in the fmt package.
The Code in Question
The following code snippet demonstrates the issue:
type Test struct { Test string } var Models = map[string]interface{}{ "test": newTest(), } func main() { test1 := Test{} fmt.Println("Test 1: ") fmt.Printf("%v", test1) fmt.Println() fmt.Println("Test 1 as pointer: ") fmt.Printf("%v", &test1) fmt.Println() test2 := Models["test"] fmt.Println("Test 2: ") fmt.Printf("%v", test2) fmt.Println() fmt.Println("Test 2 as pointer: ") fmt.Printf("%v", &test2) } func newTest() Test { var model Test return model }
The Issue
When executing the code, you'll notice a difference in the output when printing test2 versus test1 as a pointer. The output for test1 as a pointer is an empty string, while the output for test2 as a pointer is a hexadecimal representation of the address.
Explanation
The fmt.Printf function uses the %v verb for default formatting, which selects a specific format based on the type of value being printed. For pointers, the default format is the hexadecimal representation of the address.
In the first case (test1 as a pointer), the value being printed is a pointer to a Test struct. However, since the struct was initialized with zero values, the output is empty.
In the second case (test2 as a pointer), the value being printed is a pointer to an interface{}. Before reaching the %v verb, the value went through an additional wrapping inside another interface{}, which then points to Models["test"]. Since the value ultimately being printed is a pointer to an interface{}, the default formatting for pointers applies, and you get the hexadecimal representation of the address.
Solution
To address this issue, one needs to use type assertion to extract the actual Test struct from test2. This can be achieved by:
t2 := Models["test"] test2 := t2.(Test) // test2 is now of type Test
With the type assertion, the test2 variable now points to the Test struct, and you can print it like test1.
Alternatively, one can work with pointers to Test directly by storing *Test values in the map:
var Models = map[string]*Test{ "test": newTest(), }
This approach eliminates the need for type assertion and the wrapping in interface{}, thus avoiding the hexadecimal representation of the address.
The above is the detailed content of How Do Go's `fmt.Printf` and Pointer Types Interact, and Why Do They Produce Different Outputs for Different Pointer Types?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

This article explains Go's package import mechanisms: named imports (e.g., import "fmt") and blank imports (e.g., import _ "fmt"). Named imports make package contents accessible, while blank imports only execute t

This article explains Beego's NewFlash() function for inter-page data transfer in web applications. It focuses on using NewFlash() to display temporary messages (success, error, warning) between controllers, leveraging the session mechanism. Limita

This article details efficient conversion of MySQL query results into Go struct slices. It emphasizes using database/sql's Scan method for optimal performance, avoiding manual parsing. Best practices for struct field mapping using db tags and robus

This article demonstrates creating mocks and stubs in Go for unit testing. It emphasizes using interfaces, provides examples of mock implementations, and discusses best practices like keeping mocks focused and using assertion libraries. The articl

This article explores Go's custom type constraints for generics. It details how interfaces define minimum type requirements for generic functions, improving type safety and code reusability. The article also discusses limitations and best practices

This article details efficient file writing in Go, comparing os.WriteFile (suitable for small files) with os.OpenFile and buffered writes (optimal for large files). It emphasizes robust error handling, using defer, and checking for specific errors.

The article discusses writing unit tests in Go, covering best practices, mocking techniques, and tools for efficient test management.

This article explores using tracing tools to analyze Go application execution flow. It discusses manual and automatic instrumentation techniques, comparing tools like Jaeger, Zipkin, and OpenTelemetry, and highlighting effective data visualization


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
