Can `shared_ptr` Function Without Virtual Destructors?

Shared_ptr Without Virtual Destructors: A Feat of Type Erasure

In the realm of C programming, shared_ptr reigns supreme as a memory management tool. Its ability to handle shared ownership of objects effectively has made it an indispensable part of the C developer's toolkit.

However, a common misconception surrounds the implementation of shared_ptr. Some argue that it necessitates polymorphic classes with virtual destructors.

To dispel this myth, let's delve into the intricacies of shared_ptr's implementation. Contrary to popular belief, shared_ptr can indeed be realized without requiring polymorphic classes to adhere to virtual destructors.

The secret lies in a technique known as "type erasure." Through this elegant mechanism, shared_ptr operates on the sly, hiding the intricacies of its internal workings from the user's view.

To achieve this, shared_ptr employs a template constructor that enables it to handle objects of any type, including those that lack virtual destructors.

Delving into the nuts and bolts of shared_ptr's implementation, we discover a concept known as "deleters." Each shared_ptr instance houses a deleter, which serves as the master orchestrator for object cleanup upon the destruction of shared_ptr. Crucially, these deleters are type-specific, tailored to handle the deletion of objects of a particular type.

For instance, when you entrust shared_ptr with a pointer to a Derived class object, it wisely recognizes the static type (Base) and the dynamic type (Derived) of the object. It then crafts a customized deleter that understands the intricacies of Derived's destruction.

To illustrate this in action, consider the following code snippet:

class Base {};
class Derived : public Base {};

int main() {
  shared_ptr<base> sp(new Derived);
  // ...
}

Here, shared_ptr leverages its templated constructor to create an instance with the responsibility of owning the Derived object. Within this instance resides the clandestine deleter, meticulously designed to dismantle the Derived object with the dexterity of a master craftsman.

As the reference count of shared_ptr dwindles to zero, this clever deleter steps into action, invoking the appropriate destructor to bid farewell to the Derived object, thus ensuring a graceful and well-behaved cleanup.

The C 11 standard codifies this finesse, mandating that the templated constructor must have well-defined behavior for deleting pointers and prohibiting any exceptions from marring this process. Moreover, it stipulates that if a deleter is absent, the raw delete operator is summoned to perform the cleanup.

In conclusion, shared_ptr is a marvel of engineering, demonstrating how type erasure can empower it to manage objects, regardless of their polymorphic nature. This flexibility, coupled with its robust cleanup capabilities, makes shared_ptr a cornerstone of modern C programming.

The above is the detailed content of Can `shared_ptr` Function Without Virtual Destructors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!