Home >Backend Development >C++ >Can't I Store Arrays Directly in C Vectors? Why Use `std::array` Instead?
When working with data structures, it's crucial to understand the compatibility and limitations of various types. In C , it's not uncommon to encounter situations where storing arrays within a vector raises questions about proper usage.
The Issue:
Consider a scenario where you attempt to define a vector holding arrays, as shown below:
vector<float[4]> myVector;
Upon resizing the vector, you may encounter an error stating, "conversion from 'int' to non-scalar type 'float [4]' requested." This error highlights the underlying issue.
The Solution:
Arrays, unlike other fundamental data types like integers or doubles, are not inherently copy-constructible or assignable. This means they cannot be placed into containers like vectors. To overcome this limitation and store arrays in vectors, you must use an array class template.
Alternative Option: Using an Array Class Template
Array class templates provide a solution to this problem. They offer array-like functionality while ensuring compatibility with containers. Here's an example using the std::array template:
std::vector<std::array<double, 4>> myVector;
This declaration correctly utilizes the std::array class template, allowing you to store arrays of four doubles within a vector. You can resize and manipulate this vector as needed, without encountering the same errors faced with basic arrays.
Additional Templates:
Apart from std::array, there are other array class templates to choose from:
Ultimately, the choice of array class template depends on your specific requirements and the version of C you're using.
The above is the detailed content of Can't I Store Arrays Directly in C Vectors? Why Use `std::array` Instead?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!