Home >Web Front-end >JS Tutorial >ES6 Modules: Should I Export Static Methods Individually or as a Module Object?

ES6 Modules: Should I Export Static Methods Individually or as a Module Object?

Patricia Arquette
Patricia ArquetteOriginal
2024-12-05 14:06:13615browse

ES6 Modules: Should I Export Static Methods Individually or as a Module Object?

ES6 Modules: Exporting Static Methods and Individual Methods

Exporting

When exporting multiple static methods, it's recommended to use a dedicated module object rather than wrap them in a class. This approach eliminates the unnecessary class structure:

// myMethods.js
export default {
  myMethod1: () => {...},
  myMethod2: (...) => {...}
};

Importing

For importing multiple methods, explicitly listing each method in the import statement is preferred:

import {myMethod1, myMethod2} from 'myMethods';

However, the "import *" syntax is valid and can be useful if you intend to use most or all of the exports:

import * as myMethods from 'myMethods';
myMethods.myMethod1();

Performance Implications

There are minimal performance differences between the two approaches. Modern ES6 implementations optimize static identifiers well, making named exports efficient. Partial imports can also improve optimization speed by excluding unused exports. In most cases, maintainability considerations should guide the choice rather than performance.

The above is the detailed content of ES6 Modules: Should I Export Static Methods Individually or as a Module Object?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn