Await Promise.all() vs. Multiple Await: Timing Differences
In JavaScript, asynchronous operations can be handled using Promise.all() or multiple await statements. While both methods ultimately serve the same purpose of waiting for multiple promises to settle, there are some subtle timing differences between them.
Scenario 1: Using Promise.all()
Promise.all() takes an array of promises and returns a single promise that resolves to an array of results once all the input promises have settled, regardless of whether they resolve or reject.
Example:
const data = await Promise.all([res(3000), res(2000), res(1000)])
In this example, the Promise.all() method delays the resolution of data until all three input promises have resolved.
Scenario 2: Using Multiple await Statements
In this scenario, multiple await statements are used to wait for each individual promise to settle:
const t1 = task1(); const t2 = task2(); const result1 = await t1; const result2 = await t2;
Here, result1 will be resolved as soon as task1() settles, and result2 will be resolved as soon as task2() settles.
Timing Comparison
The main timing difference between these two approaches is that Promise.all() delays the resolution of the final result until all input promises have settled. This can be advantageous in scenarios where it's important to wait for all tasks to complete before proceeding.
On the other hand, using multiple await statements allows for individual tasks to settle independently, potentially resulting in a faster overall completion time.
Example Illustration
Let's consider an example where delay functions are used to simulate asynchronous tasks:
Example #1 (Using Promise.all()):
const data = await Promise.all([res(3000), res(2000), res(1000)])
Example #2 (Using Multiple await Statements):
const t1 = task1(); const t2 = task2(); const t3 = task3(); const result1 = await t1; const result2 = await t2; const result3 = await t3;
In Example #1, the Promise.all() method would delay the resolution of data until all three tasks have completed, taking 3 seconds. In Example #2, since the tasks settle independently, result1 would be available after 1 second, result2 after 2 seconds, and result3 after 3 seconds.
The above is the detailed content of Promise.all() vs. Multiple await: When Do Timing Differences Matter?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaandJavaScriptaredistinctlanguages:Javaisusedforenterpriseandmobileapps,whileJavaScriptisforinteractivewebpages.1)Javaiscompiled,staticallytyped,andrunsonJVM.2)JavaScriptisinterpreted,dynamicallytyped,andrunsinbrowsersorNode.js.3)JavausesOOPwithcl

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
