


Seeking Feedback: My React Project Structure for Scalability and Maintainability
Hey Devs! I'm working on a new React project and have put a lot of thought into structuring it for long-term scalability and maintainability. I'd love to get your feedback and hear any suggestions you might have.
I've opted for a primarily feature-based structure, centered around the concept of pages, to maximize component reuse and minimize code duplication. Here's a simplified overview:
src/
├── App/ # Application entry and providers
│ ├── Providers/ # Context providers (Theme, I18N)
│ ├── Routes/ # Routing configuration
│ └── Stores/ # Global state management (using Zustand/Redux/etc.)
├── Config/ # Application-wide configurations
├── Core/ # Core functionalities (Auth, Error handling)
├── Features/ # Page-based features
│ ├── Home/ # Home page feature
│ │ ├── Api/ # API calls related to Home
│ │ ├── Components/ # Components specific to Home
│ │ ├── I18N/ # Internationalization for Home
│ │ ├── Pages/ # Page-level components
│ │ │ └── index.tsx # Main Home page component.
│ │ │ └── SuperAdminHome.tsx # Role Specific variant
│ │ └── Stores/ # State management for Home (if needed)
│ ├── Profile/ # Profile page feature (similar structure)
│ └── Users/ # Users management feature
│ ├── Api/ # API interactions
│ ├── Components/ # Components (potentially subdivided)
│ ├── Hooks/ # Custom Hooks
│ ├── I18N/ # Internationalization
│ ├── Pages/ # Page components
│ │ ├── List/ # User list pages, Role based folder organization
│ │ │ ├── index.tsx # Main users list component
│ │ │ └── SuperAdminListActions.tsx # Variation if need be
│ │ └── Create/ # Create user pages
│ │ ├── index.tsx # Main user create component
│ │ └── SuperAdminCreateUserForm.tsx # Variation if need be
│ └── Stores/ # User-related state
├── Layout/ # Layout components (Header, Sidebar)
├── Shared/ # Shared components and utilities
│ ├── Assets/
│ ├── Components/
│ └── Utils/
└── ...
Key Decisions and Considerations:
Page-centric Features: Organizing features around pages promotes component reuse and simplifies navigation.
Role-based Variations: Role-specific variations are handled within the page's folder (e.g., separate components or conditional rendering) to keep related logic together.
Clear Separation of Concerns: Dedicated folders for API calls, components, hooks, I18N, and stores enhance maintainability.
Shared for Reusability: Reusable components and utility functions live in the Shared directory.
Questions for the Community:
What are your thoughts on this structure? Do you see any potential drawbacks or areas for improvement?
How would you handle more complex role-based variations within this structure?
Any best practices or alternative approaches you would recommend?
Is there anything I've overlooked or could be done differently to further improve scalability and maintainability?
Thanks in advance for your insights! I'm eager to learn from your experiences and improve my project architecture.
reactjs #architecture #projectstructure #webdev #discuss
The above is the detailed content of Seeking Feedback: My React Project Structure for Scalability and Maintainability. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool