Efficient Double/int64 Conversions with SSE/AVX
While SSE2 provides instructions for converting vectors between single-precision floats and 32-bit integers, corresponding intrinsics for double-precision and 64-bit integers are missing. Even AVX does not offer these conversions.
Fallback Techniques
In the absence of dedicated instructions, there are several approaches to simulate these conversions:
-
Tricks for Truncated Conversions:
- For values in specific ranges, using a shifted add and a bitwise XOR can convert double to uint64_t or int64_t in just two instructions. - Reversing these steps can perform the inverse conversions.
-
Full Range Conversions:
- Using a series of bitwise operations and shifts, it is possible to convert uint64_t or int64_t to double with 5 or 6 instructions respectively.
-
Implementation Details
The trick for truncated conversions relies on the fact that double-precision floating-point values in the range [2^52, 2^53) have their lowest mantissa bit aligning with the least significant bit. By adding a specific mask value and performing a bitwise operation, the integer representation can be obtained.
The full range conversions address the sign-extension issues and exploit the fact that addition in floating-point on x86 can cancel out fractional bits, enabling the accurate reconstruction of the double-precision result.
Rounding Behavior
The truncated conversion methods follow the current rounding mode, except that round towards zero may round towards negative infinity. The full range conversions ensure correct rounding for all modes.
Availability
The presented techniques provide a workaround for the lack of direct int64_t and double conversions in SSE/AVX. These methods can be particularly useful in optimizing code where these conversions are required, providing a balance between efficiency and accuracy.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Efficiently Convert Between Double and int64 Using SSE/AVX?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.

C code optimization can be achieved through the following strategies: 1. Manually manage memory for optimization use; 2. Write code that complies with compiler optimization rules; 3. Select appropriate algorithms and data structures; 4. Use inline functions to reduce call overhead; 5. Apply template metaprogramming to optimize at compile time; 6. Avoid unnecessary copying, use moving semantics and reference parameters; 7. Use const correctly to help compiler optimization; 8. Select appropriate data structures, such as std::vector.

The volatile keyword in C is used to inform the compiler that the value of the variable may be changed outside of code control and therefore cannot be optimized. 1) It is often used to read variables that may be modified by hardware or interrupt service programs, such as sensor state. 2) Volatile cannot guarantee multi-thread safety, and should use mutex locks or atomic operations. 3) Using volatile may cause performance slight to decrease, but ensure program correctness.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function
