Home >Backend Development >PHP Tutorial >Why Should I Avoid `require_once` in PHP and What are Better Alternatives?
The Pitfalls of Using require_once and its Better Alternatives
The PHP coding community strongly advises against using require_once due to its potential performance impact. This article explores the reasons behind this recommendation and offers alternative solutions.
Why is require_once Inefficient?
Unlike class constants, PHP defines are notably expensive in terms of performance. Moreover, using require_once is unnecessary for including classes since class_exists() can handle this task adequately. If the file being included contains procedural code, using require_once is even more redundant.
Alternative Solutions
While using class_exists() as a replacement for require_once gained traction in the past, it was not an optimal solution. Recent PHP versions have significantly improved the performance of require_once, making conditional checks and method calls far less impactful.
A broader concern regarding PHP includes, in general, is their performance cost. Each include triggers a switch to parse mode and opcode generation, creating an overhead. For applications with a substantial number of includes, this can noticeably affect performance.
Considerations for Enhancing Performance
To mitigate the performance impact of includes, consider the following strategies:
The above is the detailed content of Why Should I Avoid `require_once` in PHP and What are Better Alternatives?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!