Home  >  Article  >  Backend Development  >  Why Do Static Assertions Fail in C 17\'s `constexpr if (false)` Blocks?

Why Do Static Assertions Fail in C 17\'s `constexpr if (false)` Blocks?

DDD
DDDOriginal
2024-11-25 20:33:13335browse

Why Do Static Assertions Fail in C  17's `constexpr if (false)` Blocks?

Failed Static_Assert Behavior in Constexpr If (False) Blocks

The introduction of constexpr if in C 17 has raised concerns about the behavior of static_asserts within the non-taken branch of these statements.

According to the C standard, when a constexpr if statement appears in a templated entity, discarded statements within the non-taken branch are not instantiated. This rule prohibits the execution of static_asserts with nondependent false conditions during template instantiation, effectively deeming the program ill-formed.

This behavior stems from a more general rule that applies to all templates: if no valid specialization can be generated for a template with a substatement in a constexpr if that evaluates to false, the program is considered ill-formed, regardless of whether the template is instantiated.

For example, the following code is ill-formed, though it compiles without warning using recent versions of Clang:

template< typename T>
constexpr void other_library_foo(){
    static_assert(std::is_same<T,int>::value);
}

template<class T>
void g() {
  if constexpr (false)
    other_library_foo<T>(); 
}

This behavior extends to indirect calls to static_asserts. If a constexpr (template) function contains a static_assert with a nondependent false condition, it cannot be called within the non-taken branch of a constexpr if statement, even within a separate template.

Implications and Precautions

This limitation on static_asserts within constexpr if (false) blocks can impact the safety and usefulness of constexpr if as a replacement for SFINAE. Developers must be aware of any potential use of static_asserts in functions or libraries that may be indirectly invoked within the non-taken branch of such statements.

As a result, it is advisable to avoid using static_asserts in code that may be executed as part of a constexpr if (false) block. This practice ensures that programs remain well-formed and avoids potential compiler warnings or errors.

The above is the detailed content of Why Do Static Assertions Fail in C 17\'s `constexpr if (false)` Blocks?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn