


Awaitable Differences: When Should You `return await promise` vs `return promise`?
Awaitable Differences: return await promise vs return promise
When using asynchronous functions, there are two variations commonly used: return await promise and return promise. While these may seem similar at first glance, there are subtle differences that can impact behavior.
Immediate Resolution vs Awaiting Resolution
The primary difference lies in the timing of promise resolution. In return await promise, the async function waits for the promise to resolve before returning its value. This means that the value returned by the function is the resolved value of the promise.
On the other hand, return promise returns the promise object itself without awaiting its resolution. This allows the caller to handle the promise resolution outside the async function.
Error Handling Within the Async Function
When using return await promise, any errors thrown by the promise will be caught within the async function and bubble up to the caller. This provides a way to handle errors within the same function that initiated the asynchronous operation.
In contrast, when using return promise, errors thrown by the promise will not be caught within the async function and will be propagated to the caller. This requires the caller to handle the errors externally.
Performance Considerations
While both methods have the same observable behavior, the use of return await may have a slightly higher memory footprint. This is because an intermediate Promise object may be created when using return await, which can consume additional memory.
Nested Try-Catch Blocks
The most significant difference between the two variations occurs when the return await or return statements are nested within try-catch blocks. In this case, return await ensures that the async function waits for the promise to resolve before the catch block is executed. This means that the catch block will only execute if an error occurs after the promise has resolved.
In contrast, with return (without await), the promise is returned immediately without awaiting its resolution. Therefore, if an error occurs before the promise resolves, the catch block will execute.
Conclusion
While return await promise and return promise generally have the same observable behavior, the choice between the two depends on the specific use case and error handling requirements. For error handling within the async function, return await promise is preferred. If the caller needs to handle the promise resolution externally or for performance considerations, return promise may be more appropriate.
The above is the detailed content of Awaitable Differences: When Should You `return await promise` vs `return promise`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
