


Floating Point Rounding Disparities with Optimization Enabled: A Compiler Bug or Optimization Dilemma?
Floating point computations can often exhibit unexpected behavior, especially when compiler optimizations are enabled. Consider the following code snippet:
Expected output:
However, when this code is compiled using g with optimizations (O1 - O3), the output becomes:
Cause of Disparity:
This inconsistency stems from the fact that x86 processors internally use 80-bit extended precision for floating point calculations. However, double variables are typically 64-bit wide. When floating point values are stored from the CPU registers to memory, they are rounded from 80-bit precision to 64-bit precision. This rounding can introduce slight errors.
Impact of Optimization Levels:
Different optimization levels can affect the frequency with which floating point values are saved into memory. With higher optimization levels, this happens more frequently. As a result, the rounding error becomes more pronounced.
Solutions:
- Use the -ffloat-store GCC Option: This option instructs the compiler to store floating point variables in memory instead of registers. This forces the rounding to occur consistently across different optimization levels.
- Use the long double Type: long double is typically 80-bit wide on g . Using this type can avoid the rounding issue entirely.
- Modify Variable Storage: Store intermediate computation results into variables to minimize the rounding error.
Further Considerations:
- Intel x86_64 builds are less affected by this issue because compilers use SSE registers for float and double by default, eliminating the need for extended precision.
- -mfpmath compiler option can be used to control the floating point precision used in x86_64 builds.
- Whether to always turn on the -ffloat-store option depends on the specific application and its sensitivity to floating point accuracy. For critical applications, it may be wise to use this option to ensure consistent results.
- Investigating existing C code and libraries for potential issues can be time-consuming. Consider using tools or implementing tests to detect and address any floating point precision problems.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does My Floating-Point Rounding Code Produce Different Results with Compiler Optimizations Enabled?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.

C code optimization can be achieved through the following strategies: 1. Manually manage memory for optimization use; 2. Write code that complies with compiler optimization rules; 3. Select appropriate algorithms and data structures; 4. Use inline functions to reduce call overhead; 5. Apply template metaprogramming to optimize at compile time; 6. Avoid unnecessary copying, use moving semantics and reference parameters; 7. Use const correctly to help compiler optimization; 8. Select appropriate data structures, such as std::vector.

The volatile keyword in C is used to inform the compiler that the value of the variable may be changed outside of code control and therefore cannot be optimized. 1) It is often used to read variables that may be modified by hardware or interrupt service programs, such as sensor state. 2) Volatile cannot guarantee multi-thread safety, and should use mutex locks or atomic operations. 3) Using volatile may cause performance slight to decrease, but ensure program correctness.

Measuring thread performance in C can use the timing tools, performance analysis tools, and custom timers in the standard library. 1. Use the library to measure execution time. 2. Use gprof for performance analysis. The steps include adding the -pg option during compilation, running the program to generate a gmon.out file, and generating a performance report. 3. Use Valgrind's Callgrind module to perform more detailed analysis. The steps include running the program to generate the callgrind.out file and viewing the results using kcachegrind. 4. Custom timers can flexibly measure the execution time of a specific code segment. These methods help to fully understand thread performance and optimize code.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
