Home  >  Article  >  Backend Development  >  Which Python Timing Function is Most Accurate: time.clock() or time.time()?

Which Python Timing Function is Most Accurate: time.clock() or time.time()?

Barbara Streisand
Barbara StreisandOriginal
2024-11-11 20:53:031001browse

Which Python Timing Function is Most Accurate: time.clock() or time.time()?

Python's time.clock() vs. time.time() Accuracy

Python has two functions for timing: time.clock() and time.time(). Which function should you use for accurate timing?

time.clock() has been deprecated in Python 3.3, and it's recommended to use time.process_time() or time.perf_counter() instead.

Previously, in Python 2.7, time.clock() provided high precision for benchmarking Python or timing algorithms. On Unix systems, it returned the current processor time, while on Windows, it returned wall-clock seconds elapsed since the first call to the function.

time.time(), on the other hand, returns the number of seconds since the epoch. This function is not as precise as time.clock(), but it's suitable for measuring elapsed time in most scenarios.

For more accurate timing, the timeit module provides a benchmarking framework that allows you to compare the execution time of different code snippets with fine-grained precision.

The above is the detailed content of Which Python Timing Function is Most Accurate: time.clock() or time.time()?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn