


Different Floating Point Results with Optimization: Compiler Bug or Expected Behavior?
The code snippet provided demonstrates a discrepancy in floating-point calculation results when using optimization on different compilers. On Visual Studio 2008 and g without optimization, the code produces the expected output. However, with g optimization enabled (O1 - O3), it exhibits incorrect results.
Internal Precision on Intel x86 Processors
To understand the root cause of this behavior, it's essential to note that Intel x86 processors handle floating-point computations internally using 80-bit extended precision. In contrast, the double data type in C typically has a width of 64 bits.
Optimization and Floating-Point Storage
Optimization levels influence how often floating-point values from the CPU are stored in memory. This can lead to rounding errors when values are converted from 80-bit precision to 64-bit precision during storage.
Solving the Issue
To ensure consistent floating-point results across optimization levels, gcc provides the -ffloat-store option. By using this option, floating-point values are always stored in memory, preventing any rounding errors caused by register storage.
Alternatively, using the long double data type, which usually has a width of 80 bits on gcc, can eliminate the rounding issue altogether.
VS2008 vs. g
It's intriguing that Visual Studio 2008 provides correct results even with extended floating-point precision enabled. This suggests that VS2008 handles rounding and optimization differently compared to g .
Using -ffloat-store: Recommended Practice
While it's not strictly necessary to use -ffloat-store, it is recommended when targeting systems that use extended floating-point precision internally to ensure predictable behavior across optimization levels.
Additional Considerations
For x86_64 builds, this issue does not arise because compilers use SSE registers for float and double by default, eliminating the use of extended precision. The gcc compiler option -mfpmath allows you to control this behavior.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Floating-Point Results Differ With Optimization in Different Compilers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

This article explains the C Standard Template Library (STL), focusing on its core components: containers, iterators, algorithms, and functors. It details how these interact to enable generic programming, improving code efficiency and readability t

This article details efficient STL algorithm usage in C . It emphasizes data structure choice (vectors vs. lists), algorithm complexity analysis (e.g., std::sort vs. std::partial_sort), iterator usage, and parallel execution. Common pitfalls like

This article details effective exception handling in C , covering try, catch, and throw mechanics. It emphasizes best practices like RAII, avoiding unnecessary catch blocks, and logging exceptions for robust code. The article also addresses perf

The article discusses using move semantics in C to enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary copying. It covers implementing move constructors and assignment operators, using std::move, and identifies key scenarios and pitfalls for effective appl

C 20 ranges enhance data manipulation with expressiveness, composability, and efficiency. They simplify complex transformations and integrate into existing codebases for better performance and maintainability.

The article discusses dynamic dispatch in C , its performance costs, and optimization strategies. It highlights scenarios where dynamic dispatch impacts performance and compares it with static dispatch, emphasizing trade-offs between performance and

Article discusses effective use of rvalue references in C for move semantics, perfect forwarding, and resource management, highlighting best practices and performance improvements.(159 characters)

C memory management uses new, delete, and smart pointers. The article discusses manual vs. automated management and how smart pointers prevent memory leaks.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),