When it comes to loading JavaScript in a website, understanding how different loading methods can impact the performance and behavior of your website is important. JavaScript can be loaded in various ways, primarily using the default loading method, async, and defer. Each of these methods has its own characteristics and use cases. In this post, we’ll explore these three methods to help you make informed decisions for your projects.
Default Loading
By default, JavaScript files are loaded synchronously when included in an HTML document. This means that the browser will pause parsing the HTML document to download and execute the JavaScript file before continuing.
Here is how you typically include a script using the default method:
<script src="script.js"></script>
Async Loading
The async attribute allows the browser to download the JavaScript file asynchronously while it continues to parse the HTML document. Once the script is downloaded, it is executed immediately, potentially before the HTML parsing is complete.
<script src="script.js" async></script>
Defer Loading
The defer attribute also downloads the JavaScript file asynchronously, but the key difference is that the script is executed only after the HTML document has been fully parsed.
<script src="script.js" defer></script>
Comparing the Three Methods
Quick Tips
- Use async for Non-Critical Scripts: For scripts like analytics, advertisements, and other third-party integrations that do not depend on the DOM.
- Use defer for DOM-Dependent Scripts: For scripts that manipulate the DOM or need to be executed in a specific order.
- Minimize Default Script Loading: Avoid the default synchronous loading for large scripts or scripts that can be loaded asynchronously.
- Load Scripts at the Bottom of the Body: If you must use the default loading behavior, place your <script> tags at the end of the <body> to ensure the HTML content loads first.</script>
Conclusion
Choosing the right script loading method can significantly improve your web page’s performance and user experience. By understanding the differences between default, async, and defer, you can make informed decisions about how to load your scripts efficiently. Remember, async is great for independent scripts, defer is perfect for scripts that need the full DOM, and default loading should be limited to cases where it is absolutely necessary.
The above is the detailed content of Async vs. Defer: A Simple Explanation of Script Loading. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software
