Home >Web Front-end >CSS Tutorial >@import vs link: Is Still the Winner for CSS Imports in 2023?

@import vs link: Is Still the Winner for CSS Imports in 2023?

Patricia Arquette
Patricia ArquetteOriginal
2024-11-06 14:57:02961browse

@import vs link: Is  Still the Winner for CSS Imports in 2023?

@import vs link: Reassessing the Optimal Choice for CSS Imports

Despite previous discussions on this topic, the debate between @import and for CSS imports remains relevant. This article re-examines the issue with current tools and browser capabilities in mind.

Does @import Still Block Parallel Downloads?

No, major browsers have addressed the issue of blocking parallel downloads by @import. Modern implementations now allow parallel fetching, eliminating the performance disadvantage that @import had in the past.

Benefits of

Despite this improvement, remains the preferred choice for several reasons:

  • Simplicity: is simpler to use and understand than @import.
  • Browser Support: is universally supported, while @import has legacy support issues in some older browsers.
  • Less Overhead: incurs less overhead compared to @import, as it does not require parsing and processing an additional file.

Best Practice Today

Therefore, for maximum performance and cross-browser compatibility, it is recommended to use for CSS imports. Combining CSS files into a single file for production use, utilizing minification tools like cssmin, and using query strings for forced updates further enhances page load times and efficiency.

While @import can still be convenient, its benefits are outweighed by the advantages of in today's modern web development environment. Adhering to best practices ensures optimal performance and compatibility for your web applications.

The above is the detailed content of @import vs link: Is Still the Winner for CSS Imports in 2023?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn