Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Does SFINAE Fail for Class Template Member Functions?
SFINAE Fails for Class Template Member Functions
The Substitute Failure, Is Not An Error (SFINAE) mechanism, commonly used in template metaprogramming, appears to exhibit peculiar behavior when applied to class template member functions.
The Problem
Consider the following code snippet:
<code class="cpp">#include <type_traits> struct A{}; struct B{}; template <typename T> struct Foo { // Conditional enable bar() for T == A typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, A>::value>::type bar() {} // Conditional enable bar() for T == B typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, B>::value>::type bar() {} };</code>
This code attempts to define two overloads of bar() in the Foo class template, with SFINAE used to conditionally enable each overload based on the value of T. However, the code fails to compile with the following error:
<code class="cpp">error: 'typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, B>::value>::type Foo<T>::bar()' cannot be overloaded</code>
The Explanation
SFINAE is typically used to enable or disable template specializations based on template arguments. However, SFINAE only applies to deduced template arguments, meaning arguments that are automatically deduced during overload resolution. In the case of member functions, template arguments are not deduced but rather explicitly specified when instantiating the class. Therefore, SFINAE is not applicable to member functions.
The Solution
There are two main ways to address this issue:
<code class="cpp">template <typename T> void bar(Foo<T><- A) {} template <typename T> void bar(Foo<T><- B) {}
<code class="cpp">template <typename> struct Foo; template <> struct Foo<A> { void bar() {} }; template <> struct Foo<B> { void bar() {} };</code>
The above is the detailed content of Why Does SFINAE Fail for Class Template Member Functions?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!