Introduction
So, I’ve been working on CodeStash, this platform for sharing and discussing code snippets, kind of a cross between Reddit and Stack Overflow. The cool part? There’s a built-in AI that explains code snippets, powered by Google Gemini. Whether it's some gnarly JavaScript or Python code, CodeStash lets users request an AI explanation on demand. But… AI explanations can be a bit hit-or-miss. Some users might find the response super helpful, while others? Not so much. That’s where Formbricks comes in.
In this post, I’ll show you how I added Formbricks to survey users after they get an AI answer, checking if they found it useful. If you’re curious about in-app feedback or just want to see how Formbricks can fit into your projects, stick around!
Why Bother with Surveys?
AI is impressive, but let’s face it—sometimes it misses the mark. By asking users directly if an explanation helped, I get honest, in-the-moment feedback that I can use to fine-tune CodeStash. And Formbricks makes it super simple to add these quick, no-fuss surveys directly into the app. Win-win.
Adding Formbricks into CodeStash (w/ Next.js)
Adding Formbricks was straightforward, and the setup took less than 10 minutes. So if you're thinking, "I don't have time to add all this survey stuff," trust me, it's quicker than you think. Here’s a breakdown:
Step 1: Create Formbricks Account
Follow the steps in this quickstart guide to get started with Formbricks.
Step 2: Install Formbricks
You’ll first need the Formbricks package. Run this command to install it, then follow the steps at :
npm install @formbricks/js zod
Now, create a app/formbricks.tsx file
"use client"; import { usePathname, useSearchParams } from "next/navigation"; import { useEffect } from "react"; import formbricks from "@formbricks/js"; export default function FormbricksProvider() { const pathname = usePathname(); const searchParams = useSearchParams(); useEffect(() => { formbricks.init({ environmentId: "<environment-id>", apiHost: "<api-host>", userId: "<user-id>", //optional }); }, []); useEffect(() => { formbricks?.registerRouteChange(); }, [pathname, searchParams]); return null; } </user-id></api-host></environment-id>
Now, update your app/layout.tsx file.
// other imports import FormbricksProvider from "./formbricks"; export default function RootLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { return ( <formbricksprovider></formbricksprovider> {children} ); }
Step 3: Embed the Survey
After an AI explanation is served, a survey pops up asking users how they liked it. Here’s how to embed the survey component right in the response.
In your Formbricks account, create a new survey and in the survey trigger under settings add a code trigger with the key "ai_answer".
Now we can use formbricks.track("ai_answer") method anywhere in our code to programmatically trigger a survey.
For example...
import formbricks from "@formbricks/js"; import axios from "axios"; await axios .get("/ai/explain") .then((res) => { formbricks.track("ai_answer"); });
Step 4: Customize the Survey Questions
In the Formbricks dashboard, tweak the survey to fit what you’re looking for. I went with questions like:
“Was this explanation helpful?” (Yes, No)
“How can we improve AI explanations?” (Optional)
I kept the survey short and simple so that users aren't too distracted by the survey.
The best part? You can set the survey to appear every so often, so you’re not spamming users every time they ask for an explanation.
Screenshots
Seeing the Feedback in Action
Once responses start rolling in, Formbricks gives you the data all nice and neat. Now I can see what’s working, what’s confusing, and what needs a tweak or two.
Wrapping It Up
Adding Formbricks to CodeStash made it easy to capture honest feedback without interrupting the user experience. So if you’re building with user feedback in mind, give Formbricks a try!
Thanks for reading, and if you’re into these tools as much as I am, don’t forget to star Formbricks’ GitHub repo ⭐—and if you like CodeStash, give that a star too!
References
- Formbricks docs
- Next.js docs
The above is the detailed content of Surveying AI Satisfaction with Formbricks in CodeStash. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
