Home >Backend Development >C++ >Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures?

Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-10-31 05:57:30987browse

Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures?

Procedural Impairment: Avoiding std::enable_if in Function Signatures

Scott Meyers' upcoming book, EC 11, advises avoiding std::enable_if in function signatures. Despite its versatility in conditionally removing functions or classes from overload resolution, certain limitations and readability issues warrant reconsideration of its usage.

Methods of Employing std::enable_if in Function Signatures

Function Parameter:

<code class="cpp">template<typename T>
struct Check1
{
   template<typename U = T>
   U read(typename std::enable_if<  // Option 1: As function parameter
          std::is_same<U, int>::value >::type* = 0) { return 42; }
};</code>

Template Parameter:

<code class="cpp">template<typename T>
struct Check2
{
   template<typename U = T, typename std::enable_if<  // Option 2: As template parameter
            std::is_same<U, int>::value, int >::type = 0>
   U read() { return 42; }
};</code>

Return Type:

<code class="cpp">template<typename T>
struct Check3
{
   template<typename U = T>
   typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<U, int>::value, U>::type read() {  // Option 3: As return type
      return 42;
   }
};</code>

Recommended Approach: Placement in Template Parameters

The optimal solution involves placing the enable_if in the template parameters. This approach offers several advantages:

Readability Enhancement:
The enable_if usage is separated from return/argument types, improving clarity and reducing clutter.

Universal Applicability:
Unlike the other options, the template parameter placement is applicable to constructors and operators without additional arguments.

Return Type Exclusion:
While "Avoid std::enable_if in function signatures" primarily addresses its use in normal function signatures, it does apply to return types in template specializations. The concern stems from readability issues when merging enable_if with return types.

Member vs. Non-Member Functions:
The principle holds true for both member and non-member function templates.

The above is the detailed content of Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn