Home  >  Article  >  Backend Development  >  Why Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures and When is it Applicable to Return Types?

Why Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures and When is it Applicable to Return Types?

Barbara Streisand
Barbara StreisandOriginal
2024-10-30 17:58:30627browse

Why Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures and When is it Applicable to Return Types?

Why Should You Avoid std::enable_if in Function Signatures and When is it Applicable to Return Types?

In his upcoming book, Scott Meyers advises against using std::enable_if in function signatures. This article delves into the reasons behind this recommendation and explores alternative approaches.

std::enable_if in Function Signatures

std::enable_if can be utilized within function signatures to selectively enable functions based on template arguments. However, this usage should be avoided because:

  • Readability: Cluttered function signatures, where return types and template disambiguators are intertwined, can compromise comprehension.
  • Limited Applicability: Some contexts, such as constructors and certain operators, do not allow for this placement of std::enable_if.

std::enable_if as Template Parameter

Meyers suggests placing std::enable_if as a template parameter instead. This technique offers several advantages:

  • Enhanced Readability: The enable_if condition is closely associated with the template parameters, promoting clarity.
  • Universal Applicability: SFINAE can be applied to any template, making this approach applicable in all situations.

std::enable_if as Return Type

While std::enable_if as a return type is not technically part of the function signature, it should also be avoided for consistency reasons. The use of std::enable_if for conditional return types can lead to confusing function declarations and inconsistent behavior across template specializations.

Member vs. Non-Member Function Templates

The recommendation to avoid std::enable_if in function signatures applies to both member and non-member function templates. However, member templates offer an additional advantage: they can be specialized on the class template arguments. This allows for more flexible and efficient template specialization without the need for enable_if.

Conclusion

For improved readability and universal applicability, programmers should prioritize using std::enable_if as a template parameter instead of in function signatures or return types. This approach simplifies the code structure and makes SFINAE applicability more consistent across different contexts.

The above is the detailed content of Why Should You Avoid `std::enable_if` in Function Signatures and When is it Applicable to Return Types?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn