Home  >  Article  >  Web Front-end  >  A compelling title for your article could be: Why Does jQuery Use Different Methods for Checking Variable Existence?

A compelling title for your article could be: Why Does jQuery Use Different Methods for Checking Variable Existence?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Mary-Kate OlsenOriginal
2024-10-30 12:53:02592browse

A compelling title for your article could be:

Why Does jQuery Use Different Methods for Checking Variable Existence?

Variable Existence Comparison: === undefined vs. typeof === "undefined"

jQuery's Core Style Guidelines advocate distinct methods for ascertaining the existence of variables:

  • Global Variables: typeof variable === "undefined"
  • Local Variables: variable === undefined
  • Properties: object.prop === undefined

This begs the question: why does jQuery employ differing approaches for global variables versus local variables and properties?

Undecided Variables: typeof vs. ===

When an identifier (variable) is not declared, the typeof operator returns the string "undefined". However, an identity comparison with foo === undefined would trigger a JavaScript error: "foo is not defined".

Localized Variables: Identity Check

On the other hand, for local variables whose declarations are assumed, there's no danger of error. Consequently, jQuery opts for the identity check in this scenario.

The above is the detailed content of A compelling title for your article could be: Why Does jQuery Use Different Methods for Checking Variable Existence?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn