## Persist() vs. Merge(): When should you use which JPA/Hibernate method?

Delving into the Differences Between persist() and merge() in JPA and Hibernate

In the realm of Java Persistence API (JPA) and the prevalent Hibernate framework, two pivotal methods emerge: persist() and merge(). Understanding their distinct functionalities is crucial for effective data manipulation.

persist() Method

The persist() method is utilized to provide a life cycle transition for entities within the persistence context. It encompasses three primary scenarios:

1. New Entities: When invoked on a new entity, persist() renders it managed, signifying that it will be persisted either during transaction commit or upon flush operation execution.
2. Preexisting Managed Entities: If the entity in question is already managed, persist() overlooks it. However, it cascades to related entities if their relationships are annotated with cascade=PERSIST or cascade=ALL.
3. Removed Entities: Should the target entity be in a removed state, persist() restores its managed status.

It's noteworthy that for detached entities, persist() may trigger the EntityExistsException or other PersistenceException during invocation, flush, or commit operations.

merge() Method

In contrast to persist(), merge() focuses on merging the state of an entity into the persistence context. It exercises its influence across four primary scenarios:

1. Detached Entities: If a detached entity is presented to merge(), the pre-existing managed instance acquires the state of the detached entity (known as merging). Alternatively, a new managed copy may be generated.
2. New Entities: A new managed entity instance is established, and its state merges with that of the provided entity.
3. Removed Entities: Merge() raises an IllegalArgumentException when encountering a removed entity.
4. Managed Entities: If the target entity is already managed, merge() ignores it. Cascades, however, are triggered for referenced entities with cascade=MERGE or cascade=ALL annotations.

For entities referenced within the merged entity and annotated with cascade=MERGE or cascade=ALL, recursive merging is performed. Notably, after merging, referencing managed objects from the original entity yield references to the managed objects associated with the merged entity.

By comprehending these nuanced distinctions between persist() and merge(), developers can efficiently manage entities within JPA and Hibernate, ensuring seamless transitions between entity states and effective data manipulation.

The above is the detailed content of ## Persist() vs. Merge(): When should you use which JPA/Hibernate method?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!