Home  >  Article  >  Backend Development  >  Why Does Mixing `malloc` and `delete` in C Result in Undefined Behavior?

Why Does Mixing `malloc` and `delete` in C Result in Undefined Behavior?

Patricia Arquette
Patricia ArquetteOriginal
2024-10-27 06:30:03350browse

Why Does Mixing `malloc` and `delete` in C   Result in Undefined Behavior?

Memory Management Confusion: Interchanging malloc and delete in C

In C , memory allocation and deallocation are crucial for handling resources effectively. While there exist both C-style functions like malloc and C -specific keywords like new and delete, it's essential to understand their proper usage to avoid unintended consequences.

Consider the following code:

<code class="cpp">int *p = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
delete p;</code>

This code attempts to allocate memory using malloc but attempts to deallocate it using delete. This poses a question: why doesn't this code trigger any errors or warnings?

Undefined Behavior

The answer lies in the undefined behavior of mixing allocation and deallocation methods. There's no inherent way in the language to determine whether the pointer memory was originally allocated using new (and should be deleted) or malloc (and should be freed). Attempting to delete memory allocated with malloc is undefined behavior and can lead to unpredictable results.

Consequences of Undefined Behavior

The absence of errors or warnings doesn't imply that the code is correct. Undefined behavior means that the compiler can't verify the correctness of the code, and its behavior is essentially random. It may crash, work correctly, or do something unexpected at runtime.

Why No Warnings or Errors for Interchanging New/Free?

In the reverse scenario where memory is allocated using new and deallocated using free, there may also be no warnings or errors. This is because free simply deallocates memory without regard to its source, leaving the potential for resource leaks and other issues.

Smart Pointers

To avoid such pitfalls, it's highly recommended to use smart pointers, such as std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr. Smart pointers automatically manage memory deallocation based on their scope and ownership. They ensure that the correct deallocation method is called (delete or free) when the smart pointer goes out of scope.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does Mixing `malloc` and `delete` in C Result in Undefined Behavior?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn