Home  >  Article  >  Java  >  Why does j = j assign 0 to j in Java?

Why does j = j assign 0 to j in Java?

DDD
DDDOriginal
2024-10-27 03:26:29462browse

Why does j = j   assign 0 to j in Java?

Post Increment Operator in Java

Question:

In the code snippet below, why does the post increment operator j assign 0 to j?

public class Test {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int j = 0;
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            j = j++;
        }
        System.out.println(j); // prints 0
    }
}

According to the author of the book "Java Puzzlers," the statement j = j is similar to the following sequence:

temp = j;
j = j + 1;
j = temp;

However, the statement a = b assigns b the value 1, which contradicts the expected behavior of the post increment operator.

Answer:

The mistake in the argument lies in applying the rule of increment then assign to a = b but not to j = j . The correct sequence of operations for a = b is:

temp = b;
b = b + 1; // increment
a = temp; // assign

Applying the same rule to j = j , we get:

j = j;
j = j + 1; // increment

As the initial value of j was 0, the post increment operator returns 0 because the value of j before the increment is used in the expression.

Therefore, the final value of j is 0 because the assignment statement evaluates to j = 0.

The above is the detailed content of Why does j = j assign 0 to j in Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn