In this article, we will analyze ErrorBoundary class component in Zustand’s test case. Error handling is a crucial part of any React application.
Overview of the Test Case
Here’s the test case we’ll be exploring:
// Picked from https://github.com/pmndrs/zustand/blob/v4.5.5/tests/basic.test.tsx#L378 it('can throw an error in equality checker', async () => { console.error = vi.fn() type State = { value: string | number } const initialState: State = { value: 'foo' } const useBoundStore = createWithEqualityFn(() => initialState, Object.is) const { setState } = useBoundStore const selector = (s: State) => s const equalityFn = (a: State, b: State) => // @ts-expect-error This function is supposed to throw an error a.value.trim() === b.value.trim() class ErrorBoundary extends ClassComponent { constructor(props: { children?: ReactNode | undefined }) { super(props) this.state = { hasError: false } } static getDerivedStateFromError() { return { hasError: true } } render() { return this.state.hasError ? <div>errored</div> : this.props.children } } function Component() { useBoundStore(selector, equalityFn) return <div>no error</div> } const { findByText } = render( <strictmode> <errorboundary> <component></component> </errorboundary> </strictmode>, ) await findByText('no error') act(() => { setState({ value: 123 }) }) await findByText('errored') })
This test verifies that when an error occurs inside an equality checker, the error is caught and handled gracefully by an ErrorBoundary component.
Key Concepts in the Test Case
1. Zustand’s createWithEqualityFn
Zustand allows you to define stores with custom equality functions using createWithEqualityFn. In this test, the initial state is defined as:
const initialState: State = { value: 'foo' }
The createWithEqualityFn function is used to create a store where the equality function is defined to compare states based on whether the value property is equal. In this case, the equality checker is intentionally set to throw an error when value is of a type other than string:
You can intentionally throw errors in your test cases to ensure your code handles errors as expected.
const equalityFn = (a: State, b: State) => a.value.trim() === b.value.trim() // Throws error if 'value' is not a string
The test case expects this equality function to fail when value becomes a number, causing the error handler to come into play.
2. Custom ErrorBoundary Component
React’s ErrorBoundary component is a common pattern used to catch JavaScript errors in a component tree, and Zustand has taken this approach to test how errors within their state management are handled. This particular test case defines a custom ErrorBoundary component directly inside the test. I mean, how often do you come across a test case that has the custom ErrorBoundary with in a “test case”?
class ErrorBoundary extends ClassComponent { constructor(props: { children?: ReactNode | undefined }) { super(props) this.state = { hasError: false } } static getDerivedStateFromError() { return { hasError: true } } render() { return this.state.hasError ? <div>errored</div> : this.props.children } }
How it works:
The component uses the lifecycle method getDerivedStateFromError() to catch errors and update its state (hasError) to true.
-
If an error is detected, the component renders
errored. Otherwise, it renders its children.
In typical production use, ErrorBoundary components are created as reusable elements to catch and display errors across the application. However, embedding the ErrorBoundary directly inside a test case like this provides fine-grained control over error testing, allowing you to assert that the component reacts correctly when errors occur in specific parts of the application.
3. Testing Error Handling with Vitest
In this test case, Vitest is used as the testing framework. Here’s how it works with Zustand:
- Rendering the Component: The Component that uses the useBoundStore hook is rendered inside the ErrorBoundary within a React StrictMode block. This ensures that errors inside the equality checker can be caught.
const { findByText } = render( <strictmode> <errorboundary> <component></component> </errorboundary> </strictmode>, ) await findByText('no error')
At this point, the test verifies that no error has been thrown yet and checks for the text no error.
Triggering the Error: After the component is initially rendered without errors, the test triggers an error by updating the store’s state to a number:
act(() => { setState({ value: 123 }) })
This causes the equality function to throw an error, as value.trim() is no longer valid for a number type.
Asserting the Error Handling: Once the error is thrown, the ErrorBoundary catches it, and the test waits for the UI to render the errored message:
await findByText('errored')
- This assertion confirms that the error was properly caught and displayed by the ErrorBoundary
Why This Approach is Unique
What makes this test case particularly interesting is the use of an inline ErrorBoundary component within a unit test. Typically, error boundaries are part of the main React app, wrapping components in the main render tree. However, Zustand's approach to create an error boundary in the test suite itself offers a more flexible and isolated way to test how errors are handled under specific conditions.
By directly controlling the boundary within the test, Zustand ensures:
Granularity: The test can focus on how errors in a particular part of the application (like the equality checker) are handled, without needing to rely on global error boundaries.
Test Isolation: The ErrorBoundary exists only within the scope of this test, reducing potential side effects or dependencies on the app’s broader error-handling logic.
About us:
At Think Throo, we are on a mission to teach the advanced codebase architectural concepts used in open-source projects.
10x your coding skills by practising advanced architectural concepts in Next.js/React, learn the best practices and build production-grade projects.
We are open source — https://github.com/thinkthroo/thinkthroo (Do give us a star!)
Up skill your team with our advanced courses based on codebase architecture. Reach out to us at hello@thinkthroo.com to learn more!
References:
- https://github.com/pmndrs/zustand/blob/v4.5.5/tests/basic.test.tsx#L378
The above is the detailed content of Here's how Zustand's test-case uses ErrorBoundary.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaandJavaScriptaredistinctlanguages:Javaisusedforenterpriseandmobileapps,whileJavaScriptisforinteractivewebpages.1)Javaiscompiled,staticallytyped,andrunsonJVM.2)JavaScriptisinterpreted,dynamicallytyped,andrunsinbrowsersorNode.js.3)JavausesOOPwithcl

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
