-
What is structuredClone()?
- structuredClone() is a global function introduced in 2022 that enables deep cloning of JavaScript objects. Unlike traditional methods like JSON.stringify() and JSON.parse(), which struggle with complex structures and circular references, structuredClone() handles these challenges effortlessly.
-
Why is it a game-changer?
- It’s a robust tool for creating true deep clones, preserving the integrity of nested objects and circular references without the need for extra logic or workarounds. Plus, it's available in modern environments, including Web Workers.
1. Simple Object Cloning: The Basics
- Using {...obj} (Shallow Copy)
const original = { name: "Alice", details: { age: 25 } }; const shallowCopy = { ...original }; shallowCopy.details.age = 30; console.log(original.details.age); // 30 console.log(shallowCopy.details.age); // 30
-
What's happening?
- The spread operator {...obj} only creates a shallow copy. The details object is not deeply cloned, so changes to shallowCopy.details affect the original details as well.
- Using JSON.stringify() + JSON.parse() (Deep Copy)
const original = { name: "Alice", details: { age: 25 } }; const deepCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(original)); deepCopy.details.age = 30; console.log(original.details.age); // 25 console.log(deepCopy.details.age); // 30
-
What's happening?
- This method creates a deep copy, but it has limitations: it cannot handle functions, undefined, or circular references.
- Using structuredClone() (Deep Copy)
const original = { name: "Alice", details: { age: 25 } }; const clone = structuredClone(original); clone.details.age = 30; console.log(original.details.age); // 25 console.log(clone.details.age); // 30
-
What's happening?
- structuredClone() creates a deep clone, preserving the structure without any of the limitations of JSON.stringify() and handling complex data types like circular references and undefined.
2. Handling Circular References: A Challenge
- Circular Reference with {...obj}
const original = { name: "Alice" }; original.self = original; // This will cause an error: const shallowCopy = { ...original }; // TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
-
What's happening?
- {...obj} can’t handle circular references, resulting in an error.
- Circular Reference with JSON.stringify()
const original = { name: "Alice" }; original.self = original; // This will cause an error: const jsonCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(original)); // TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
-
What's happening?
- JSON.stringify() also fails with circular references, throwing an error.
- Circular Reference with structuredClone()
const original = { name: "Alice" }; original.self = original; const clone = structuredClone(original); console.log(clone !== original); // true console.log(clone.self === clone); // true
-
What's happening?
- structuredClone() seamlessly handles circular references, creating a proper deep clone without errors.
3. Cloning with Functions and undefined: Another Test
- Using {...obj}
const original = { name: "Alice", greet: () => "Hello!", value: undefined }; const shallowCopy = { ...original }; console.log(shallowCopy.greet()); // "Hello!" console.log(shallowCopy.value); // undefined
-
What's happening?
- {...obj} copies functions and undefined as expected, but only shallowly.
- Using JSON.stringify()
const original = { name: "Alice", greet: () => "Hello!", value: undefined }; const jsonCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(original)); console.log(jsonCopy.greet); // undefined console.log(jsonCopy.value); // undefined
-
What's happening?
- JSON.stringify() cannot serialize functions or undefined, resulting in their loss in the cloned object.
- Using structuredClone()
const original = { name: "Alice", greet: () => "Hello!", value: undefined }; const clone = structuredClone(original); console.log(clone.greet); // undefined console.log(clone.value); // undefined
-
What's happening?
- structuredClone() also does not clone functions but preserves undefined values, making it more reliable than JSON.stringify() for complex objects.
4. Speed and Efficiency: A Performance Note
- Efficiency with Large Data
const largeArray = new Array(1e6).fill({ key: "value" }); console.time("structuredClone"); const clone = structuredClone(largeArray); console.timeEnd("structuredClone"); console.time("JSON.stringify + JSON.parse"); const jsonCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(largeArray)); console.timeEnd("JSON.stringify + JSON.parse");
-
What's happening?
- structuredClone() is often faster than JSON.stringify() + JSON.parse() for large, complex data, and avoids the pitfalls of serializing and deserializing.
5. Conclusion: Why structuredClone() is the Future
- Reliability: Handles circular references, functions, and undefined values more predictably.
- Efficiency: Performs deep cloning faster for large datasets and doesn’t require workarounds.
- Simplicity: One method to rule them all—no more choosing between {...obj}, JSON.stringify(), or custom deep clone functions.
The above is the detailed content of Bye-Bye `JSON.stringify()` and `{...obj}`, Hello `structuredClone()`!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
