This article compares CommonJS and ES modules, two distinct module systems in JavaScript, highlighting key differences in syntax, scope, dependency management, build tools, and provides guidance for converting CommonJS modules to ES modules using Bab
What are the key differences between CommonJS and ES modules?
CommonJS and ES modules are two different module systems for JavaScript. The key differences between them are:
-
Syntax: CommonJS modules use the
require()
andmodule.exports
syntax, while ES modules use theimport
andexport
syntax. - Scope: CommonJS modules are wrapped in a function scope, while ES modules are not. This means that variables and functions in a CommonJS module are not accessible outside of the module, while variables and functions in an ES module are.
- Dependencies: CommonJS modules use a synchronous require() system to load dependencies, while ES modules use a asynchronous import() system to load dependencies.
- Build tools: CommonJS modules are typically bundled using a build tool such as Webpack or Rollup, while ES modules can be bundled using a build tool or loaded directly in the browser.
require()
and module.exports
syntax, while ES modules use the import
and export
syntax.How do CommonJS and ES modules handle dependencies?
CommonJS modules use a synchronous require()
system to load dependencies. This means that when a CommonJS module requires another module, the required module is loaded immediately and its exports are returned.
ES modules use an asynchronous import()
system to load dependencies. This means that when an ES module imports another module, the imported module is not loaded immediately. Instead, the import()
CommonJS modules are wrapped in a function scope, while ES modules are not. This means that variables and functions in a CommonJS module are not accessible outside of the module, while variables and functions in an ES module are.
Dependencies:
CommonJS modules use a synchronous require() system to load dependencies, while ES modules use a asynchronous import() system to load dependencies.Build tools:🎜 CommonJS modules are typically bundled using a build tool such as Webpack or Rollup, while ES modules can be bundled using a build tool or loaded directly in the browser.🎜How do CommonJS and ES modules handle dependencies?🎜🎜CommonJS modules use a synchronousrequire()
system to load dependencies. This means that when a CommonJS module requires another module, the required module is loaded immediately and its exports are returned.🎜🎜ES modules use an asynchronous import()
system to load dependencies. This means that when an ES module imports another module, the imported module is not loaded immediately. Instead, the import()
statement returns a Promise that resolves to the imported module's exports.🎜🎜How can I convert a CommonJS module to an ES module?🎜🎜There are a few ways to convert a CommonJS module to an ES module. One way is to use a build tool such as Babel. Babel is a JavaScript compiler that can convert CommonJS modules to ES modules.🎜🎜Another way to convert a CommonJS module to an ES module is to use a module wrapper. A module wrapper is a function that takes a CommonJS module as an argument and returns an ES module.🎜The above is the detailed content of commonjs es module difference. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
