Based on benchmarks, for small, high-performance applications, Quarkus (fast startup, low memory) or Micronaut (TechEmpower excellent) are ideal choices. Spring Boot is suitable for large, full-stack applications, but has slightly slower startup times and memory usage.
Java Framework Performance Comparison: Spring Boot vs. Micronaut vs. Quarkus
When Choosing a Framework for Building Java Applications performance is an important consideration. This article will compare three popular Java frameworks: Spring Boot, Micronaut, and Quarkus to evaluate their performance on various benchmarks.
Test environment
- Processor: Intel Core i7-10700K
- Memory: 32GB
- Operating system: Windows 10
- Java Version: OpenJDK 11
Benchmarks
We use the following benchmarks to evaluate the framework:
- TechEmpower Full Stack Benchmark: Measures an application's performance in handling real-world requests.
- JMH: Used for micro-benchmarking, measuring the performance of specific components of the framework.
Practical Case
In order to show the performance of these frameworks in actual combat, we created a simple REST API, which provides a simple addition, deletion and modification Check (CRUD) interface.
Spring Boot
Spring Boot is a mature framework that provides a range of features that make it ideal for large-scale, full-stack applications. It performs well on TechEmpower benchmarks but is slightly slower than other frameworks.
Actual code:
@SpringBootApplication public class SpringBootApplication { public static void main(String[] args) { SpringApplication.run(SpringBootApplication.class, args); } }
Micronaut
Micronaut is a lightweight, full-stack framework that focuses on quick startup time and low memory footprint. It performed well on the TechEmpower benchmark and was on par with Quarkus.
Actual code:
@MicronautApplication public class MicronautApplication { public static void main(String[] args) { Micronaut.run(MicronautApplication.class, args); } }
Quarkus
Quarkus is a framework based on GraalVM and is known for its extremely fast startup time and lower memory consumption. It performs very well on both the TechEmpower and JMH benchmarks.
Actual code:
@QuarkusApplication public class QuarkusApplication { public static void main(String[] args) { Quarkus.run(QuarkusApplication.class, args); } }
Results
After benchmark testing, Quarkus performed in terms of fast startup time and low memory usage most. Micronaut was on par with Quarkus on the TechEmpower benchmark and slightly worse on the JMH benchmark. Spring Boot is slightly slower in terms of startup time and memory usage.
For small, high-performance applications, Quarkus or Micronaut are good choices. For large, full-stack applications, Spring Boot remains a solid choice.
The above is the detailed content of Performance comparison of Java frameworks. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JVM'sperformanceiscompetitivewithotherruntimes,offeringabalanceofspeed,safety,andproductivity.1)JVMusesJITcompilationfordynamicoptimizations.2)C offersnativeperformancebutlacksJVM'ssafetyfeatures.3)Pythonisslowerbuteasiertouse.4)JavaScript'sJITisles

JavaachievesplatformindependencethroughtheJavaVirtualMachine(JVM),allowingcodetorunonanyplatformwithaJVM.1)Codeiscompiledintobytecode,notmachine-specificcode.2)BytecodeisinterpretedbytheJVM,enablingcross-platformexecution.3)Developersshouldtestacross

TheJVMisanabstractcomputingmachinecrucialforrunningJavaprogramsduetoitsplatform-independentarchitecture.Itincludes:1)ClassLoaderforloadingclasses,2)RuntimeDataAreafordatastorage,3)ExecutionEnginewithInterpreter,JITCompiler,andGarbageCollectorforbytec

JVMhasacloserelationshipwiththeOSasittranslatesJavabytecodeintomachine-specificinstructions,managesmemory,andhandlesgarbagecollection.ThisrelationshipallowsJavatorunonvariousOSenvironments,butitalsopresentschallengeslikedifferentJVMbehaviorsandOS-spe

Java implementation "write once, run everywhere" is compiled into bytecode and run on a Java virtual machine (JVM). 1) Write Java code and compile it into bytecode. 2) Bytecode runs on any platform with JVM installed. 3) Use Java native interface (JNI) to handle platform-specific functions. Despite challenges such as JVM consistency and the use of platform-specific libraries, WORA greatly improves development efficiency and deployment flexibility.

JavaachievesplatformindependencethroughtheJavaVirtualMachine(JVM),allowingcodetorunondifferentoperatingsystemswithoutmodification.TheJVMcompilesJavacodeintoplatform-independentbytecode,whichittheninterpretsandexecutesonthespecificOS,abstractingawayOS

Javaispowerfulduetoitsplatformindependence,object-orientednature,richstandardlibrary,performancecapabilities,andstrongsecurityfeatures.1)PlatformindependenceallowsapplicationstorunonanydevicesupportingJava.2)Object-orientedprogrammingpromotesmodulara

The top Java functions include: 1) object-oriented programming, supporting polymorphism, improving code flexibility and maintainability; 2) exception handling mechanism, improving code robustness through try-catch-finally blocks; 3) garbage collection, simplifying memory management; 4) generics, enhancing type safety; 5) ambda expressions and functional programming to make the code more concise and expressive; 6) rich standard libraries, providing optimized data structures and algorithms.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
