


The extremely popular thinking chain technology may be overthrown!
Still surprised that large models can actually use thinking chains to think step by step?
Still struggling to write the thought chain prompt words?
Researchers from New York University said: "It doesn't matter, it's all the same."
The reasoning steps are not important, even if you don't want to write prompt words You don’t need to write it, just use an ellipsis instead.
Paper address: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.15758
This article The title even directly uses "Let's think dot by dot" to compare with the "Let's think step by step" of the thinking chain, showing the power of "ellipsis".
The power of "little bits"
Researchers found that the specific details in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning Steps are replaced with meaningless "...", and the reasoning results produced are also very different.
For example, in the following example: let the model count how many of the first 6 numbers are greater than 5.
If you directly raise the question and let the model answer it, the result will be quite unbelievable: 7 out of 6.
In contrast, using the thought chain prompt, the model will compare the size step by step, and finally get the correct answer: "25, 15 , 25, that's 3 digits".
But what is even more outrageous is the "metaphysical" method used in this article: there is no need to write the steps, you only need to output the same number of "dots" (dots), and it does not affect the final result. result.
——This is not a coincidence. A large number of experiments have proved that the performance of the latter two methods is close.
In other words, we thought that the model performance improvement came from "think step by step", but in fact it may just be because LLM has obtained the computing power of more tokens!
You think the model is thinking, but in fact it is grilling.
——Stupid human beings, you actually try to teach me how to reason with naive examples. Do you know that what I want is always just calculate.
"Thought chain has never existed and will never exist in the future" (Gotou).
Jacob Pfau, the author of the article, said that this work proves that the model does not benefit from the linguistic reasoning brought by the thinking chain. Using repeated "..." to fill the token can achieve The same effect as CoT.
# Of course, this also raises the issue of alignment: because this fact shows that the model can do hidden reasoning that is not visible in CoT, to a certain extent out of human control.
Netizens were shocked
The conclusion of the article can be said to have overturned our long-standing cognition. Some netizens said: I learned the essence of mask. .
"What exactly does this mean: The model can use these tokens to think independently without our knowledge."
Some netizens said, no wonder I always like to use "..." when typing
Some netizens started the actual test directly:
Although we don’t know if his understanding is correct~
However, some netizens believe that LLM’s hidden reasoning in the chain of thinking is unfounded. After all, the output of large models is based on probability in principle, rather than through conscious thinking.
CoT prompts only make a subset of statistical patterns explicit. Models simulate inference by generating text that is consistent with the pattern, but they do not have the ability to verify or reflect on their output.
Think dot by dot
Faced with complex problems, we humans subconsciously perform step-by-step reasoning.
Inspired by this, Google researchers published the famous Chain-of-Thought in 2022.
The method that requires the language model to solve problems step by step enables the model to solve problems that seemed unsolvable before, significantly improving the performance of LLM, or tapping the potential of LLM.
Paper address: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.11903
Although at the beginning Everyone didn’t know why this thing worked, but because it was really easy to use, it quickly spread widely.
With the take-off of large models and prompt word projects, CoT has become a powerful tool for LLM to solve complex problems.
Of course, there are many research teams exploring the working principle of CoT during this process.
The model does not reason
The performance improvement brought by the thinking chain is whether the model really learned to solve the problem step by step, or just Because of the extra calculation caused by a longer token number?
Since you are not sure whether logical reasoning will work, then simply do not use logic and replace all the reasoning steps with "..." which is definitely useless. This is called filler. ) tokens.
The researchers used a "little alpaca" model: a 34M parameter Llama with 4 layers, 384 hidden dimensions and 6 attention heads. The model parameters were randomly initialized.
Consider two questions here:
(1) What types of evaluation data can benefit from filling tokens
(2) What kind of training data is needed to teach the model to use filled tokens
In this regard, the researchers designed 2 tasks and constructed corresponding synthetic data sets, each of which highlights a different condition under which filling tokens can provide performance improvements to the Transformer.
3SUM
## Let’s look at the first more difficult task: 3SUM. The model is required to select three numbers in the sequence that meet the conditions. For example, the sum of the three numbers divided by 10 will have a remainder of 0.
In the worst case, the complexity of this task is N to the third power, and the calculation between Transformer layers is complicated Degree is the second power of N,
So, when the length of the input sequence is very large, the 3SUM problem will naturally exceed the expression ability of Transformer.
The experiment set up three groups of controls:
1. Fill token: Sequence usage Repeating ". . ." is used as middle padding, such as "A05
B75 C22 D13: . . . . . . . . . . . . ANS True".
Each point represents a separate token, which corresponds to the token in the following thinking chain.
2. Parallelizable CoT solution, the sequence is in the form: "A05 B75 C22 D13 : AB 70 AC 27 AD 18 BC 97 BD 88 CD B ANS True”.
Thinking chain simplifies the 3SUM problem into a series of 2SUM problems by writing all relevant intermediate sums (as shown in the figure below). This method reduces the calculation amount of the problem to the power of N - Transformer can handle it and can be parallelized.
3. Adaptive CoT solution, the sequence is in the form: "A15 B75 C22 D13: A B C 15 75 22 2 B C D 75 22 13 0 ANS True”.
Unlike the above scheme, which cleverly decomposes 3SUM into parallelizable sub-problems, here we hope to use heuristic methods to generate flexible thinking chains to imitate human reasoning. This kind of instance adaptive calculation is incompatible with the parallel structure of filling token calculation.
#As can be seen from the results in the above figure, without outputting the padding token, the accuracy of the model generally decreases as the sequence becomes longer. decreases, while the accuracy remains at 100% when using padding tokens.
2SUM-Transform
The second task is 2SUM-Transform, which only needs to determine the sum of two numbers Whether it meets the requirements and the amount of calculation is under the control of Transformer.
#However, in order to prevent the model from "cheating", the input token is calculated on the spot, and each number entered is moved by a random offset.
The results are shown in the table above: the accuracy of the filler token method reaches 93.6%, which is very close to Chain-of-Thought without using an intermediate In the case of padding, the accuracy is only 78.7%.
But, is this improvement simply due to differences in the presentation of the training data, such as by regularizing the loss gradient?
To verify whether filling tokens brings hidden calculations related to the final prediction, the researchers froze the model weights and only fine-tuned the last attention layer.
The above results show that as more fill tokens are available, the accuracy of the model continues to improve, indicating that fill tokens are indeed performing the same thing as 3SUM predicts hidden calculations related to the task.
Limitations
Although the method of filling tokens is very metaphysical, magical, and even effective, it has to be said that the chain of thinking has been overturned. It's still too early.
The author also stated that the method of filling tokens did not break the upper limit of Transformer’s computational complexity.
Moreover, learning to use filling tokens requires a specific training process. For example, intensive supervision is used in this article to make the model finally converge.
However, some problems may have surfaced, such as hidden security issues, such as whether the prompt word project will suddenly cease to exist one day?
The above is the detailed content of The thought chain no longer exists? Latest research from New York University: The reasoning step can be omitted. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

1 前言在发布DALL·E的15个月后,OpenAI在今年春天带了续作DALL·E 2,以其更加惊艳的效果和丰富的可玩性迅速占领了各大AI社区的头条。近年来,随着生成对抗网络(GAN)、变分自编码器(VAE)、扩散模型(Diffusion models)的出现,深度学习已向世人展现其强大的图像生成能力;加上GPT-3、BERT等NLP模型的成功,人类正逐步打破文本和图像的信息界限。在DALL·E 2中,只需输入简单的文本(prompt),它就可以生成多张1024*1024的高清图像。这些图像甚至

Wav2vec 2.0 [1],HuBERT [2] 和 WavLM [3] 等语音预训练模型,通过在多达上万小时的无标注语音数据(如 Libri-light )上的自监督学习,显著提升了自动语音识别(Automatic Speech Recognition, ASR),语音合成(Text-to-speech, TTS)和语音转换(Voice Conversation,VC)等语音下游任务的性能。然而这些模型都没有公开的中文版本,不便于应用在中文语音研究场景。 WenetSpeech [4] 是

“Making large models smaller”这是很多语言模型研究人员的学术追求,针对大模型昂贵的环境和训练成本,陈丹琦在智源大会青源学术年会上做了题为“Making large models smaller”的特邀报告。报告中重点提及了基于记忆增强的TRIME算法和基于粗细粒度联合剪枝和逐层蒸馏的CofiPruning算法。前者能够在不改变模型结构的基础上兼顾语言模型困惑度和检索速度方面的优势;而后者可以在保证下游任务准确度的同时实现更快的处理速度,具有更小的模型结构。陈丹琦 普

由于复杂的注意力机制和模型设计,大多数现有的视觉 Transformer(ViT)在现实的工业部署场景中不能像卷积神经网络(CNN)那样高效地执行。这就带来了一个问题:视觉神经网络能否像 CNN 一样快速推断并像 ViT 一样强大?近期一些工作试图设计 CNN-Transformer 混合架构来解决这个问题,但这些工作的整体性能远不能令人满意。基于此,来自字节跳动的研究者提出了一种能在现实工业场景中有效部署的下一代视觉 Transformer——Next-ViT。从延迟 / 准确性权衡的角度看,

3月27号,Stability AI的创始人兼首席执行官Emad Mostaque在一条推文中宣布,Stable Diffusion XL 现已可用于公开测试。以下是一些事项:“XL”不是这个新的AI模型的官方名称。一旦发布稳定性AI公司的官方公告,名称将会更改。与先前版本相比,图像质量有所提高与先前版本相比,图像生成速度大大加快。示例图像让我们看看新旧AI模型在结果上的差异。Prompt: Luxury sports car with aerodynamic curves, shot in a

译者 | 李睿审校 | 孙淑娟近年来, Transformer 机器学习模型已经成为深度学习和深度神经网络技术进步的主要亮点之一。它主要用于自然语言处理中的高级应用。谷歌正在使用它来增强其搜索引擎结果。OpenAI 使用 Transformer 创建了著名的 GPT-2和 GPT-3模型。自从2017年首次亮相以来,Transformer 架构不断发展并扩展到多种不同的变体,从语言任务扩展到其他领域。它们已被用于时间序列预测。它们是 DeepMind 的蛋白质结构预测模型 AlphaFold

人工智能就是一个「拼财力」的行业,如果没有高性能计算设备,别说开发基础模型,就连微调模型都做不到。但如果只靠拼硬件,单靠当前计算性能的发展速度,迟早有一天无法满足日益膨胀的需求,所以还需要配套的软件来协调统筹计算能力,这时候就需要用到「智能计算」技术。最近,来自之江实验室、中国工程院、国防科技大学、浙江大学等多达十二个国内外研究机构共同发表了一篇论文,首次对智能计算领域进行了全面的调研,涵盖了理论基础、智能与计算的技术融合、重要应用、挑战和未来前景。论文链接:https://spj.scien

说起2010年南非世界杯的最大网红,一定非「章鱼保罗」莫属!这只位于德国海洋生物中心的神奇章鱼,不仅成功预测了德国队全部七场比赛的结果,还顺利地选出了最终的总冠军西班牙队。不幸的是,保罗已经永远地离开了我们,但它的「遗产」却在人们预测足球比赛结果的尝试中持续存在。在艾伦图灵研究所(The Alan Turing Institute),随着2022年卡塔尔世界杯的持续进行,三位研究员Nick Barlow、Jack Roberts和Ryan Chan决定用一种AI算法预测今年的冠军归属。预测模型图


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.