What are the performance differences between different garbage collectors in Java?

Garbage collector performance differences in Java depend on throughput, latency and overhead. Suitable for high-throughput applications include Parallel GC and G1 GC, while suitable for low-latency applications are CMS and G1 GC. Choosing the appropriate GC algorithm depends on the specific needs of the application, such as parallel GC for throughput and CMS or G1 GC for latency. By using the JVM option [-XX:+PrintGCDetails] you can monitor GC activity in your application and understand how different GC algorithms affect performance.

The performance difference of different garbage collectors in Java

The garbage collector (GC) is the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) An important component responsible for reclaiming memory for objects that are no longer in use. Different GC algorithms have different performance characteristics, so choosing the right GC is crucial for optimizing Java applications.

Common GC algorithms

The most common GC algorithms in Java include:

• Serial GC : Single-threaded GC, suitable for small applications and short-running tasks.
• Parallel GC: Multi-threaded GC can improve throughput, but will increase overhead.
• Concurrent Mark Sweep GC (CMS): Concurrent GC, allowing the application to continue running while the GC is running, providing lower latency.
• G1 GC: The latest GC algorithm uses a combination of generational collection and parallel collection to achieve high throughput and low latency.

Performance Difference

Different GC algorithms show different performance differences in the following aspects:

• Throughput Amount: refers to the speed at which GC reclaims memory. Parallel GC and G1 GC generally have higher throughput than serial GC.
• Delay: Refers to the time the GC pauses application execution. CMS and G1 GC generally have lower latency than serial GC and parallel GC.
• Overhead: Refers to the resources required for the GC to run itself. Parallel GC and G1 GC generally have higher overhead than serial GC.

Practical case

Consider the following two applications:

• Transaction processing system: Required High throughput and extremely low latency to handle large volumes of transactions.
• Batch processing system: A large amount of data needs to be processed, but latency is not a critical factor.

For transaction processing systems, CMS or G1 GC are better choices as they offer lower latency. For batch processing systems, parallel GC or serial GC may be more suitable because of their higher throughput.

Choose the right GC

Choosing the right GC algorithm depends on the specific needs of your application. Here are some general guidelines:

• For low-latency applications: Choose CMS or G1 GC.
• For high-throughput applications: Choose Parallel GC or G1 GC.
• For simple applications: Select Serial GC.

You can use [-XX:+PrintGCDetails](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/19/docs/api/html/ jdk/management/package-summary.html#MXBEAN - (Java-class-java.lang.management.GarbageCollectorMXBean\)-_XX.2BPrintGCDetails_) JVM options to monitor GC activity in your application and understand how different GC algorithms affect performance.

The above is the detailed content of What are the performance differences between different garbage collectors in Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!