Implementing simulated page loading progress bar based on jQuery_jquery
Because we can't get the size of the entire page and how much is currently loaded by any method, the only way to make a loading progress bar is to simulate it. So how to simulate it?
We know that the page is executed from top to bottom, which means we can roughly estimate how much is loaded at a certain location on the page, and then use jq to simulate a progress bar to display.
First we draw a progress bar, which is what it looks like in the picture above. There is no need to explain this too much. Just look at the code yourself
CSS
.loading{position:relative;top:0;left:0}
.tip1{float:left ;background:#A70000;color:#fff;height:32px;line-height:32px;padding:0 15px;border:0;position:relative}
.jindu{float:left;margin-left:20px; color:#fff;width:150px;height:32px;line-height:32px;background:#000;position:relative}
.jindu b{color:#A70000;width:0;height:0;font- size:0px;border-width:10px;border-color:#fff #fff #fff #A70000;border-style:solid;position:absolute;left:-20px;top:5px;overflow:hidden}
. jindu .jindu2{width:0px;height:32px;line-height:32px;background:#A70000;position:absolute}
.jindu .text{width:150px;height:32px;line-height:32px;text -align:center;position:absolute}
HTML
Attention at this time, we need to quote the jquery library, the quoted The location is not in the head area, but immediately below the html code. Why is this? The reason why we put the styles in the head is to ensure that the styles are loaded in the first step of loading the page, so that the page will not be messy. JS is not needed, and the large files on the page are mainly js, so loading js in the body is for the progress bar.
The progress bar is drawn and referenced by jquery. Now we have to write a method, that is, we can make the progress bar move
var loading = function(a,b){
var c = b*1.5;
if(b==100){
$('.bgloader .jindu2').animate({width:c 'px'},500,function(){
$('.bgloader .tip1').text(a);
$( '.bgloader font').text(b);
$('.bgloader .loading').animate({top:'-32px'},1000,function(){
$('.bgloader ').fadeOut();
});
});
}else{
$('.bgloader .jindu2').animate({width:c 'px'},500 ,function(){
$('.bgloader .tip1').text(a);
$('.bgloader font').text(b);
});
}
};
Here I wrote loading(a,b). The two parameters are to display the loading content prompt information and the loading progress percentage. Then, I used several other js Library does loading progress test
demo下载地址:点击下载

JavaandJavaScriptaredistinctlanguages:Javaisusedforenterpriseandmobileapps,whileJavaScriptisforinteractivewebpages.1)Javaiscompiled,staticallytyped,andrunsonJVM.2)JavaScriptisinterpreted,dynamicallytyped,andrunsinbrowsersorNode.js.3)JavausesOOPwithcl

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!
