


Implementation principle and js code of proportionally displaying pictures on web pages_javascript skills
On dynamic websites, you often need to upload your own pictures, and the size of these pictures is unknown. When displayed as thumbnails, they must be scaled proportionally to display them beautifully. Take the recent golf website (http://www.changligolfsales.com) as an example.
This website needs to upload golf product images and display them as thumbnails on the list. The site server supports Asp, but does not support thumbnail generation components such as aspjpeg, so the uploaded images are directly displayed as thumbnails. , you need to scale it proportionally. The premise is to get the length and width of the picture. The first method that comes to mind is to read the length and width information of the picture through the ADODB.STREAM object when uploading, save it in the database, and read it when the page is generated. Take it out and calculate the ratio. The obvious disadvantage of this method is that each picture needs to be read and calculated on the server, which consumes more resources and increases the page opening delay.
The second method uses Javascript to transfer the calculation to the client.
The principle is to use Javascript on the client to read the size of each image and scale it after the page is loaded (onload trigger).
//Scale the imageDest image proportionally to fit Displayed in the area of width W and height H
function ResizeImage(imageDest, W, H)
{
//Display box width W, height H
var image = new Image();
image.src = imageDest.src;
if(image.width>0 && image.height>0)
{
//Compare aspect ratio
if(image.width/image. height >= W/H)//Relative display frame: width > height
{
if(image.width > W) //The width is greater than the display frame width W, the height should be compressed
{
imageDest.width = W;
imageDest.height = (image.height*W)/image.width;
}
else //The width is less than or equal to the display box width W, and the picture is completely Display
{
imageDest.width = image.width;
imageDest.height = image.height;
}
}
else//Similarly
{
if(image.height > H)
{
imageDest.height = H;
imageDest.width = (image.width*H)/image.height;
}
else
{
imageDest.width = image.width;
imageDest.height = image.height;
}
}
}
}
The above function scales the image.
The id of each thumbnail on the golf website is set to imgProductItem, such as:
Add a batch operation function:
// Scale all images with specified ids in the page proportionally
function RsizeAllImageById(id, W, H)
{
var imgs = document.getElementsByTagName("img");
for(var i= 0; i
if(imgs[i].id == id)
{
ResizeImage(imgs[i], W, H);
}
}
}
In this way, add
; add in the head area:
will display all images as thumbnails.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
