


I often need to use window.onload when doing projects,
is used as follows:
function func(){alert("this is window onload event!");return;}
window.onload=func;
or as follows:
window.onload=function(){alert("this is window onload event!");return;}
But window.onload cannot load multiple functions at the same time.
For example:
function t(){
alert("t")
}
function b(){
alert("b")
}
window.onload =t ;
window.onload =b ;
The previous one will be overwritten later, and the above code will only output b.
The following method can be used to solve this problem:
window.onload =function() { t(); b(); }
Another solution is as follows:
function addLoadEvent(func) {
var oldonload = window.onload;//Get the function of the previous onload event
if (typeof window.onload != 'function') {//Determine whether the type is is 'function', note that typeof returns the string
window.onload = func;
} else {
window.onload = function() {
oldonload();//override before calling The function of the onload event---->Since I don’t know much about js, I temporarily understand it as loading multiple functions by overriding the function of the onload event
func();//Call the current event function
}
}
}
//(Full example) is used as follows:
function t(){
alert("t")
}
function b(){
alert("b")
}
function c(){
alert("c")
}
function addLoadEvent(func) {
var oldonload = window.onload;
if (typeof window.onload != 'function') {
window.onload = func;
} else {
window.onload = function() {
oldonload();
func();
}
}
}
addLoadEvent(t);
addLoadEvent(b);
addLoadEvent(c);
//Equivalent to window.onload =function() { t(); b(); c( ) ;}
Personally, I think it is faster to use implicit functions directly (such as: window.onload =function() { t(); b(); c() ;}). Of course, use addLoadEvent Be more professional, and everyone should take their own approach!
JS window.onload append function:
<script><BR>if(window.attachEvent)//IE: If the window.attachEvent function exists in the browser, use the window.attachEvent function to determine whether it is IE. You can also use: if (document.all ){//..}<BR>window.attachEvent("onload",function() {alert("add method");});<BR>else //FireFox<BR>window.addEventListener("load" ,function() {alert("add method");},true);<BR></script>
runs, the alert message pops up in js, and the problem is solved.
============Related information================
attachEvent Binds the specified function to an event so that the function is called whenever the event fires on the object.
Internet Explorer has provided an attachEvent method since 5.0. Using this method, you can assign multiple processing processes to an event. attachEvent also works for current Opera. But Mozilla/Firefox does not support this method. But it supports another addEventListener method, which is similar to attachEvent and is also used to assign multiple handlers to an event. But there are some differences in the events they assign. In the attachEvent method, the event starts with "on", but in addEventListener, the event does not start with "on". In addition, addEventListener has a third parameter. Generally, this parameter is specified as false. That's it.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
