


About dynamic selection of JavaScript objects and traversing objects_javascript skills
(1) Dynamic selection of methods and attributes
In actual work, we often encounter this situation: calling one of the two methods [1] according to a certain condition, or between two attributes Read and write operations are performed on one of [2]. The following code shows this situation:
if (condition ) {
myObj.method1(someArg);
} else {
myObj.method2(someArg);
}
JavaScript provides a simple syntax, That is, use the square bracket operator ([]) to dynamically select methods and properties. As the following code shows, JavaScript has two equivalent member access syntaxes (this feature is common in dynamic languages):
obj[expressionResultingInMembername] == obj.memberName
If you have used Integer subscript to access an element in the array, then you have begun to use the square bracket operator for dynamic member selection. This is because the array object itself contains properties named with numeric subscripts (as well as the length property). However, JavaScript doesn't allow you to access these properties directly using the dot operator (.), so myArray.0 is syntactically illegal (too bad, it's a cool syntax).
Why is the square bracket operator more powerful than the dot operator notation? This is because you can access an object's members using anything that represents a member name within square brackets. These include literals, variables holding member names, name combinations (in most cases string concatenation), and fast if/then selection using the ternary operator (condition ? valueIfTrue : valueIfFalse). All of this content will be processed into a string, and then JavaScript will use this string to find the corresponding member.
Since functions in JavaScript are themselves objects, they can be referenced like other values. If the result of an expression is a function, you can call it directly using the parentheses operator, just like you would call a function directly using its name.
It should be noted that if you use a lot of such techniques on the parameters passed to the method, the confusing parentheses may make the code difficult to read. In this case, it is more sensible to use the regular if/else structure.
(2) JavaScript traverses object properties and methods
JavaScript uses the for in statement to traverse the object's properties and methods. The for in statement loops through the JavaScript object. Each time it loops, it will obtain a property or method of the object.
Syntax:
for(valueName in ObjectName){
// Code
}
Among them, valueName is the variable name, which saves the name of the attribute or method. The value of valueName will change every time it loops.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment