Many JS framework libraries choose to use the $ symbol as function or variable names, and jQuery is the most typical one. In jQuery, the $ symbol is just a reference to the window.jQuery object, so even if $ is deleted, window.jQuery is still a strong backing to ensure the integrity of the entire class library. The API design of jQuery takes full consideration of reference conflicts between multiple frameworks. We can use the jQuery.noConflict method to easily transfer control.
The jQuery.noConflict method contains an optional Boolean parameter [1], which determines whether to hand over the jQuery object itself when handing over the $ reference:
jQuery.noConflict([removeAll])
By default, executing noConflict will transfer control of the variable $ to the first library that generates $; when removeAll is set to true, executing noConflict will transfer all control of $ and the jQuery object itself to The first library to generate them.
For example, when KISSY and jQuery are mixed, and $ = KISSY is used to simplify API operations, this method can be used to solve the naming conflict problem.
So how is this mechanism implemented? Read the beginning of jQuery source code [2], the first thing to do is this:
// Map over jQuery in case of overwrite
_jQuery = window.jQuery,
// Map over the $ in case of overwrite
_$ = window.$,
It is easy to understand that jQuery maps the two objects jQuery and $ in the window environment through two private variables to prevent the variables from being forcibly overwritten. Once the noConflict method is called, the difference between _jQuery, _$, jQuery, $ is used to determine the transfer method of control. The specific code is as follows:
noConflict: function( deep ) {
If ( deep && window. jQuery === jQuery ) {
jQuery = 🎜> Let’s look at the parameter setting issue mentioned above. If deep does not Setting, _$ overrides window.$, at this time the jQuery alias $ is invalid, but jQuery itself is intact. If another library or code redefines the $ variable, control of it is completely transferred. On the other hand, if deep is set to true, _jQuery overwrites window.jQuery, and both $ and jQuery will be invalid.
The advantage of this operation is that no matter it is a highly conflicting execution environment such as framework mixing or jQuery multi-version coexistence, due to the handover mechanism provided by the noConflict method and the fact that it returns an uncovered jQuery object, it can be completely mapped through variables way to resolve conflicts.
But the unavoidable fact is that it may cause plug-in failure and other problems. Of course, it can be restored by simply modifying the context parameters. $ Alias:
The code is as follows:
The following example also solves this problem
Since its birth, there have been more and more versions of jQuery, and new versions of the jQuery official website are still being updated and released. However, we have already used older versions of jQuery in previous projects, such as: 1.3.X, 1.4.X, 1.5.X, 1.6.2, etc.
Due to the needs of the project, it is necessary to continue to use newer versions of jQuery. However, for the old jQuery versions that already exist and have been adopted, how do we allow multiple different jQuery versions to coexist on the same page without What about conflict?
In fact, using the jQuery.noConflict() feature, we can not only let jQuery coexist with other JS libraries, such as Prototype. Can also coexist with other different versions of jQuery itself without conflict.
="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.js">
jQuery_New = $.noConflict(true);
” http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.2/jquery.min.js">
="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.5.2/jquery.min.js">
var jQuery_1_5_2 = $.noConflict(true);
" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js">
/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js">

JavaandJavaScriptaredistinctlanguages:Javaisusedforenterpriseandmobileapps,whileJavaScriptisforinteractivewebpages.1)Javaiscompiled,staticallytyped,andrunsonJVM.2)JavaScriptisinterpreted,dynamicallytyped,andrunsinbrowsersorNode.js.3)JavausesOOPwithcl

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
