How to use jquery's new binding event mechanism on method_jquery
Browsing jQuery’s deprecated list, I found live() and die() in it. I quickly took a look and found that starting from jQuery 1.7, jQuery has introduced a new event binding mechanism, on() and off() The two functions handle event binding uniformly. Because there were bind(), live(), delegate() and other methods to handle event binding before, jQuery decided to launch a new function to unify the event binding methods and replace the previous methods from the aspects of performance optimization and method unification. .
on(events,[selector],[data],fn)
events: One or more event types separated by spaces and an optional namespace, such as "click" or "keydown.myPlugin".
selector: A selector string for the descendants of the selector element that triggers the filter event. If the selector is null or omitted, the event is always fired when it reaches the selected element.
data: When an event is triggered, event.data must be passed to the event processing function.
fn: The function executed when the event is triggered. The false value can also be used as a shorthand for a function that returns false.
Replace bind()
When the second parameter 'selector' is null, there is basically no difference in usage between on() and bind(), so we can think that on() is just better than bind () has an optional 'selector' parameter, so on() can easily replace bind()
Replace live()
Before 1.4, I believe everyone liked to use live() because it can bind events to current and future elements. Of course, after 1.4, delegate() can also do similar things. Something happened. The principle of live() is very simple. It delegates events through the document, so we can also use on() to achieve the same effect as live() by binding the event to the document.
Live() writing method
$('#list li').live('click', '#list li', function() {
//function code here.
});
on() is written as
$(document). on('click', '#list li', function() {
//function code here.
});
The key here is that the second parameter 'selector' is in effect. It acts as a filter, and only descendant elements of the selected element will trigger the event.
Replace delegate()
delegate() was introduced in 1.4, with the purpose of delegating event binding issues of descendant elements through ancestor elements. To some extent, it has similar advantages to live(). It's just that live() is delegated through the document element, and delegate can be any ancestor node. The writing method of using on() to implement the proxy is basically the same as that of delegate().
How to write delegate()
$('# list').delegate('li', 'click', function() {
//function code here.
});
on() writing method
$('#list ').on('click', 'li', function() {
//function code here.
});
It seems that the order of the first and second parameters is reversed, but everything else is basically the same.
Summary
jQuery launched on() for two purposes, one is to unify the interface, and the other is to improve performance, so from now on, use on() to replace bind(), live(), and delegate. In particular, don't use live() anymore, because it is already on the deprecated list and will be killed at any time. If you only bind the event once, then use one(), there is no change in this.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
