


javascript object-oriented encapsulation and inheritance_javascript skills
Let’s sort out the encapsulation and inheritance in js object-oriented.
1. Encapsulation
There are many ways to implement encapsulation in js. Here are some commonly used ones.
1.1 Original mode generation object
Directly write our members into the object and return them with the function. Disadvantages: It is difficult to see an instance of a pattern.
Code:
function Stu(name, score) {
return {
name: name,
score: score
}
}
var stu1 = Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = Stu("李思", 90);
console.log(stu1.name); // Zhang San
1.2 Generating construction pattern objects
js provides us with a pattern of using constructors to generate objects. The so-called "constructor" is actually an ordinary function, but the this variable is used internally. When the new keyword is used to generate an instance of the constructor, the this variable will be bound to the instance object.
Directly enter the code:
Function Stu(name, score) {
This.name = name,
This.score = score
}
var stu1 = new Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = new Stu("李思", 90);
console.log(stu1.name "/" stu2.score); // Zhang San 90
console.log((stu1.constructor == Stu) "/" (stu2.constructor == Stu)); // true true
console.log((stu1 instanceof Stu) "/" (stu2 instanceof Stu)); // true true
It is not difficult to see that the object generated by the js constructor is exactly the same as the object generated by class in C#. Both use templates to define object members and instantiate them through the new keyword.
Generate the same Stu object using C# code
Class Stu
{
public string name;
public double score;
}
OK, now we have the basic objects. So now we need a method that is common to all objects, and only allows this method to be created once. (Not created repeatedly with object new) What should I do? Everyone knows that in C# we can use static members. So how to do it in js?
1.3 Prototype Mode
In js, each constructor has a prototype attribute. All properties and methods of this object will be inherited by the instance of the constructor. Then adding members directly to the prototype is equivalent to declaring static members in C#.
Code:
Function Stu(name, score) {
This.name = name,
This.score = score
}
Stu.prototype.type='Student';
Stu.prototype.log = function (s) {
console.log(s);
}
var stu1 = new Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = new Stu("李思", 90);
console.log(stu1.type "/" stu2.type); // Student Student
stu1.log('hello'); // hello
console.log(stu1.log == stu2.log); // true
That’s it for encapsulation. Let’s take a look at how inheritance is implemented in js?
2. Inheritance
2.1 Constructor Binding
Directly call the call or apply method in the child function to bind the parent object’s constructor to the child object.
function Stu(name, score) {
Grade.apply(this, arguments);
//Grade.call(this, arguments);
This.name = name,
This.score = score
}
function Grade() {
This.code = "Junior High School";
This.ask = function () {
console.log("Hello everyone");
}
}
var stu1 = new Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = new Stu("李思", 90);
console.log(stu1.code); // Junior High School
stu1.ask(); // Hello everyone
The apply here does two things. It gives the first parameter this to the Grade constructor (caller), and then executes the code in Grade. It is equivalent to executing the members defined with this in Grade again in Stu.
2.2 Inheritance through prototype
Look at the code first
Code:
Function Stu(name, score) {
This.name = name,
This.score = score
}
function Grade() {
This.code = "Junior High School";
}
Stu.prototype = new Grade();
Stu.prototype.constructor = Stu; //Prevent inheritance chain disorder and manually reset the statement
var stu1 = new Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = new Stu("李思", 90);
console.log(Stu.prototype.constructor); // Own constructor
console.log(stu1.code); // Junior High School
As mentioned before, prototype is equivalent to a static member in C#, so we turn all members of the parent class into our own static members to achieve inheritance.
There is a disadvantage of inheritance through prototype: all inherited members are static, so how to inherit object members?
2.3 Copy inheritance
Copy all properties and methods of the parent object into the child object to achieve inheritance.
Code:
Function Stu(name, score) {
This.name = name,
This.score = score
}
function Grade() {}
Grade.prototype.code = "Junior High School";
}
//Function encapsulation
function extend(C, P) {
var p = P.prototype;
var c = C.prototype;
for (var i in p) {
c[i] = p[i];
}
}
extend(Stu, Grade);
var stu1 = new Stu("张三", 80);
var stu2 = new Stu("李思", 90);
stu1.code='High School';
console.log(stu1.code); // High School
console.log(stu2.code); // Junior High School
console.log(Stu.prototype.constructor);
console.log(Grade.prototype.constructor)
That’s it for the js object-oriented organization. This thing is not static. You can make changes according to your own needs when using it. There is a saying that is very good, the right one is the best.
Here we only analyze encapsulation and inheritance. We will do some other articles in the future to give you a deeper understanding of JavaScript object-oriented programming. Of course, these are all personal understandings. If there are any omissions, please contact me.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor
