假设List<BigObject> list = new ArrayList<>();
private static class BigObject{
private byte[] foo;
BigObject(){
foo = new byte[20 * 1024];
}
}
不断add BigObject,其引用关系是如下吗?
然后发生ygc,是BigObject进入了old区不,如果arrayList对象没进入old区,那岂不是就出现跨代引用了? 如果进入了,那ygc后又obj = new BigObject()在新生代分配, 然后list.add(obj), 岂不是会出现old->young区的引用,其内存分配究竟是怎么样的?
运行下面这段代码:
参数:/jdk1.7.0_79.jdk/bin/java -Xmx500M -Xms500M -Xmn200M -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseCMSInitiatingOccupancyOnly -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=90 -XX:+PrintGCApplicationConcurrentTime -XX:+PrintGCApplicationStoppedTime -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -Xloggc:/Users/*/temp/test.gc.log
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
/**
* @author ***
* @time 2017-04-19-11:14
*/
public class CrossReference {
private static int unit = 20 * 1024;
public static void main(String[] args) {
allocate();
try {
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println("allocate end************");
Thread.sleep(100000);
} catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private static void allocate(){
List<BigObject> list = new ArrayList<>();
int size = 1024 * 1024 * 400;
int len = size / unit;
for( int i = 0; i < len; i++){
BigObject bigObject = new BigObject();
list.add(bigObject);
}
}
private static class BigObject{
private byte[] foo;
BigObject(){
foo = new byte[unit]; //
}
}
}
查看gc.log将会出现在执行完allocate()方法后,old区仍然占用在90%以上,不断进行CMS GC但是并不能回收。
高洛峰2017-05-17 10:09:27
我最近看到两篇文章,应该对你有用:
http://zhuanlan.51cto.com/art...
http://zhuanlan.51cto.com/art...