Class - Person
@interface Person : NSObject
@property (nonatomic, copy) NSString *lastName;
@end
@implementation Person
@synthesize lastName = _lastName;
- (instancetype)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
_lastName = @"abc";
}
return self;
}
- (NSString *)lastName {
return _lastName;
}
- (void)setLastName:(NSString *)lastName {
_lastName = lastName;
}
@end
Class - SmithPerson
@interface SmithPerson : Person
@end
@implementation SmithPerson
- (instancetype)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
self.lastName = @"aaa";
}
return self;
}
@end
以上在子類別SmithPerson中沒有重寫lastName的getter/setter方法,我可以在init中透過self.lastName重新賦值,但是如果我在子類別中重寫了getter/setter,那怎麼重新賦值呢? self.lastName會呼叫子類別的setter方法,setter中如果這樣賦值就死循環了
- (void)setLastName:(NSString *)lastName {
self.lastName = lastName;
}
另外:如果將Person和SmithPerson的init方法改成下面這樣,同時子類別重寫父類別lastName的getter/setter:
Person
- (instancetype)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
**self.lastName = @"abc";**
}
return self;
}
SmithPerson
- (instancetype)init {
self = [super init];
if (self) {
}
return self;
}
那麼執行下面語句時,父類別初始化時的self.lastName為什麼會呼叫子類別的setter
SmithPerson *p1 = [[SmithPerson alloc] init];
大家讲道理2017-05-02 09:32:21
1、子類別重寫了getter/setter
@interface SmithPerson : Person
@end
@implementation SmithPerson
- (void)setLastName:(NSString *)lastName {
[super setLastName:lastName];
}
@end
2、
self.lastName = @"abc";
//该方法等价于 [self setLastName:@"abc"];
//self 的类型为SmithPerson,所以会调用SmithPerson 类的 -setLastName: 方法