Background: If you did not read my first blog post about why I am sharing my thoughts on the benchmarks published by Mark Callaghan on Small Datum you may want to skim through it now for a little context:“Thoughts on Small Datum – Part 1”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Last time, in“Thoughts on Small Datum – Part 2”I shared my cliff notes and a graph onMark Callaghan’s (@markcallaghan) March 11th insertion rate benchmarks using flash storage media. In those tests he comparesMySQL outfitted with theInnoDBstorage engine against two distributions ofMongoDB: basic MongoDB fromMongoDB, Inc.andTokuMX(the high-performance distribution of MongoDB from Tokutek).
Later, in his March 24th“TokuMX, MongoDB and InnoDB Versus the Insert Benchmark with Disks”Mark presents similar benchmark findings for a new set of insertion rate tests using a different benchmark and the same DBMS products. This time however he uses servers configured with traditional disk storage media instead of flash. In addition he does a number of things to configure the products and tests differently than he did in the flash storage benchmarks.
As the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. The X-axis here is the number of rows being inserted at each stage of the test. The Y-axis is the insertion rate recorded at those levels (and in this case,biggeris better).
As you can see, Mark found that TokuMX outperforms MySQL/InnoDB as well as basic MongoDB. He also found that shortly after 500M rows it became impractical to test MongoDB (it was taking unreasonably long time to let the test run to completion). The same thing happened with MySQL/InnoDB after 1.6B rows. TokuMX was still running strong at 2B rows.
Note: Mark tests several different configurations of MongoDB, trying to find the optimum configuration. For the purposes of my visual aid I selected the fastest / best MongoDB configuration at each level of 100M rows. That’s not very scientific of me but I wanted to be as fair as possible in the visual comparison.
Bottom Line:Like the flash storage test covered last time, the tests with traditional disk storage show that both MySQL with InnoDB and TokuMX significantly outperform basic MongoDB in benchmarks testing for write-intensive applications. Both MongoDB (540M rows) and MySQL/InnoDB (1.6B rows) become unresponsive in these tests as the database gets large.
This suggests that if your application is a write-intensive NoSQL one, and your servers are outfitted with traditional disk storage, it will perform significantly better on the TokuMX high-performance distribution of MongoDB. And that, with TokuMX performance will not degrade significantly as the database grows. It also shows basic MongoDB may not even be suitable for write-intensive applications that are expected to grow beyond 500M rows.
One footnote: TokuDB (the Tokutek high-performance MySQL storage engine alternative to InnoDB that employees the same underlying technology as TokuMX) isnotcovered in Mark’s benchmark. That’s too bad because it delivers better performance and scalability than InnoDB for your NewSQL applications.
You can read all the gory details on Mark’sMarch 24th insertion rate benchmark here. And, you can download and tryTokuMX for yourself (for free) here.
As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome below. You can also reach me on Twitter via@dcrosenlund.
Next time, in Thoughts on Small Datum – Part 4, this marketer’s summary and graphs for Mark’sIO-bound point queries tests using sysbench.

MySQL和SQLite的主要區別在於設計理念和使用場景:1.MySQL適用於大型應用和企業級解決方案,支持高性能和高並發;2.SQLite適合移動應用和桌面軟件,輕量級且易於嵌入。

MySQL中的索引是數據庫表中一列或多列的有序結構,用於加速數據檢索。 1)索引通過減少掃描數據量提升查詢速度。 2)B-Tree索引利用平衡樹結構,適合範圍查詢和排序。 3)創建索引使用CREATEINDEX語句,如CREATEINDEXidx_customer_idONorders(customer_id)。 4)複合索引可優化多列查詢,如CREATEINDEXidx_customer_orderONorders(customer_id,order_date)。 5)使用EXPLAIN分析查詢計劃,避

在MySQL中使用事務可以確保數據一致性。 1)通過STARTTRANSACTION開始事務,執行SQL操作後用COMMIT提交或ROLLBACK回滾。 2)使用SAVEPOINT可以設置保存點,允許部分回滾。 3)性能優化建議包括縮短事務時間、避免大規模查詢和合理使用隔離級別。

選擇PostgreSQL而非MySQL的場景包括:1)需要復雜查詢和高級SQL功能,2)要求嚴格的數據完整性和ACID遵從性,3)需要高級空間功能,4)處理大數據集時需要高性能。 PostgreSQL在這些方面表現出色,適合需要復雜數據處理和高數據完整性的項目。

MySQL數據庫的安全可以通過以下措施實現:1.用戶權限管理:通過CREATEUSER和GRANT命令嚴格控制訪問權限。 2.加密傳輸:配置SSL/TLS確保數據傳輸安全。 3.數據庫備份和恢復:使用mysqldump或mysqlpump定期備份數據。 4.高級安全策略:使用防火牆限制訪問,並啟用審計日誌記錄操作。 5.性能優化與最佳實踐:通過索引和查詢優化以及定期維護兼顧安全和性能。

如何有效監控MySQL性能?使用mysqladmin、SHOWGLOBALSTATUS、PerconaMonitoringandManagement(PMM)和MySQLEnterpriseMonitor等工具。 1.使用mysqladmin查看連接數。 2.用SHOWGLOBALSTATUS查看查詢數。 3.PMM提供詳細性能數據和圖形化界面。 4.MySQLEnterpriseMonitor提供豐富的監控功能和報警機制。

MySQL和SQLServer的区别在于:1)MySQL是开源的,适用于Web和嵌入式系统,2)SQLServer是微软的商业产品,适用于企业级应用。两者在存储引擎、性能优化和应用场景上有显著差异,选择时需考虑项目规模和未来扩展性。

在需要高可用性、高級安全性和良好集成性的企業級應用場景下,應選擇SQLServer而不是MySQL。 1)SQLServer提供企業級功能,如高可用性和高級安全性。 2)它與微軟生態系統如VisualStudio和PowerBI緊密集成。 3)SQLServer在性能優化方面表現出色,支持內存優化表和列存儲索引。


熱AI工具

Undresser.AI Undress
人工智慧驅動的應用程序,用於創建逼真的裸體照片

AI Clothes Remover
用於從照片中去除衣服的線上人工智慧工具。

Undress AI Tool
免費脫衣圖片

Clothoff.io
AI脫衣器

Video Face Swap
使用我們完全免費的人工智慧換臉工具,輕鬆在任何影片中換臉!

熱門文章

熱工具

SublimeText3漢化版
中文版,非常好用

SublimeText3 英文版
推薦:為Win版本,支援程式碼提示!

SublimeText3 Linux新版
SublimeText3 Linux最新版

WebStorm Mac版
好用的JavaScript開發工具

mPDF
mPDF是一個PHP庫,可以從UTF-8編碼的HTML產生PDF檔案。原作者Ian Back編寫mPDF以從他的網站上「即時」輸出PDF文件,並處理不同的語言。與原始腳本如HTML2FPDF相比,它的速度較慢,並且在使用Unicode字體時產生的檔案較大,但支援CSS樣式等,並進行了大量增強。支援幾乎所有語言,包括RTL(阿拉伯語和希伯來語)和CJK(中日韓)。支援嵌套的區塊級元素(如P、DIV),