mysql教程

实例演示使用并行和非并行选项的性能差异

WBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWBOYWB

Jun 07, 2016 pm 03:29 PM

direct使用實例差異平行效能比較示範選項

比较direct方式使用并行和非并行选项的性能差异。并行测试创建测试表 create table sqlldr_paral nologging PARTITION BY HASH (sfzh) (partition p1 tablespace users , partition p2tablespace zdry_tbs2 ) AS SELECT *FROM sfxx2 where 1=2 ; sqlldr_pa

比较direct方式使用并行和非并行选项的性能差异。

并行测试

创建测试表

create table sqlldr_paral

nologging

PARTITION BY HASH (sfzh)

(partition p1 tablespace users , partition p2tablespace zdry_tbs2 )

AS SELECT *FROM sfxx2 where 1=2 ;

sqlldr_paral.ctl

LOAD DATA

INFILE 'd:\flatfile\flatfile.dat'

APPEND

INTO TABLE sqlldr_paral

fields terminated by X'23'

TRAILING NULLCOLS

(zj,

…字段太多省略

cjdwdm)

sqlldr_paral.par

USERID=zdrygk/zdrygk

CONTROL='d:\flatfile\sqlldr_paral.ctl'

DATA='d:\flatfile\flatfile.dat'

LOG='d:\flatfile\sqlldr_paral.log'

DIRECT=true

parallel=true

ERRORS=10000

执行

D:\flatfile>sqlldrparfile=d:\flatfile\sqlldr_paral.par

SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production onMon Jan 7 23:21:42 2013

Load completed - logical record count 3022375.

sqlldr_paral.log

Control File: d:\flatfile\sqlldr_paral.ctl

Data File: d:\flatfile\flatfile.dat

BadFile: d:\flatfile\flatfile.bad

DiscardFile: none specified

(Allowall discards)

Number to load: ALL

Number to skip: 0

Errors allowed: 10000

Continuation: none specified

Path used: Direct- with parallel option. -----这里指定了并行选项

Table SQLLDR_PARAL, loaded from every logicalrecord.

Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND

TRAILING NULLCOLS option in effect

Table SQLLDR_PARAL:

3017264Rows successfully loaded.

5111Rows not loaded due to data errors.

0 Rows not loaded because all WHEN clauseswere failed.

0 Rowsnot loaded because all fields were null.

Dateconversion cache disabled due to overflow (default size: 1000)

Partition P1: 1509091 Rows loaded.

Partition P2: 1508173 Rows loaded.

Bind array size not used in direct path.

Column array rows : 5000

Stream buffer bytes: 256000

Read buffer bytes: 1048576

Total logical records skipped: 0

Total logical records read: 3022375

Total logical records rejected: 5111

Total logical records discarded: 0

Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader mainthread: 1301

Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader loadthread: 3901

Run began on Mon Jan 07 23:21:42 2013

Run ended on Mon Jan 07 23:22:18 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:35.91

CPU time was: 00:00:25.79

非并行测试

创建测试表

create table sqlldr_nopal

nologging

PARTITION BY HASH (sfzh)

(partition p1 tablespace users , partition p2tablespace zdry_tbs2 )

AS SELECT *FROM sfxx2 where 1=2 ;

sqlldr_nopar.ctl

LOAD DATA

INFILE 'd:\flatfile\flatfile.dat'

APPEND

INTO TABLEsqlldr_nopar

fields terminated by X'23'

TRAILING NULLCOLS

(zj,

…字段太多省略

cjdwdm)

sqlldr_nopar.par

这里删除了并行选项

USERID=zdrygk/zdrygk

CONTROL='d:\flatfile\sqlldr_nopar.ctl'

DATA='d:\flatfile\flatfile.dat'

LOG='d:\flatfile\sqlldr_nopar.log'

DIRECT=true

ERRORS=10000

执行

D:\flatfile>sqlldrparfile=d:\flatfile\sqlldr_nopar.par

SQL*Loader: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production onMon Jan 7 23:20:54 2013

Load completed - logical record count 3022375.

sqlldr_nopar.log

Control File: d:\flatfile\sqlldr_nopar.ctl

Data File: d:\flatfile\flatfile.dat

BadFile: d:\flatfile\flatfile.bad

DiscardFile: none specified

(Allowall discards)

Number to load: ALL

Number to skip: 0

Errors allowed: 10000

Continuation: none specified

Path used: Direct ----这里只是指定了直接路径加载

Table SQLLDR_NOPAR, loaded from every logicalrecord.

Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND

TRAILING NULLCOLS option in effect

Table SQLLDR_NOPAR:

3017264Rows successfully loaded.

5111Rows not loaded due to data errors.

0 Rows not loaded because all WHEN clauseswere failed.

0 Rowsnot loaded because all fields were null.

Dateconversion cache disabled due to overflow (default size: 1000)

Partition P1: 1509091 Rows loaded.

Partition P2: 1508173 Rows loaded.

Bind array size not used in direct path.

Column array rows : 5000

Stream buffer bytes: 256000

Read buffer bytes: 1048576

Total logical records skipped: 0

Total logical records read: 3022375

Total logical records rejected: 5111

Total logical records discarded: 0

Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader mainthread: 1301

Total stream buffers loaded by SQL*Loader loadthread: 3901

Run began on Mon Jan 07 23:20:54 2013

Run ended on Mon Jan 07 23:21:28 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:33.81

CPU time was: 00:00:25.32

分析

Load Mode	Elapsed time(ss.99)
Direct	33.81
Direct + parallel	35.91

笔者做了多次试验，除了第一次消耗时间较长（因为表空间自动拓展），后面的实验中两种模式的用时大致相同。自己猜测在使用Direct 直接路径加载的情况下，多线程并不能提高效率。

在Util中找到关于sql*loader command line的描述

PARALLEL(parallel load)

Default: false

PARALLELspecifies whether direct loads canoperate in multiple concurrent sessions

to load data into the same table.

parallel这个参数用来设定使用direct loads的时候是否使用并发的session去加载数据到相同的表中。

于是测试了多文件，多session加载数据的情况。

D:\flatfile>sqluldr2 user=zdrygk/zdrygk@orclquery=sfxx2 degree=8 file=d:\flatfile\ldrfiles%t.dat field=0x23 size=300MB

0rows exported at 2013-01-08 00:07:26, size 0 MB.

output file d:\flatfile\ldrfiles1357574846.dat closed at 707972 rows,size 304 MB.

output file d:\flatfile\ldrfiles1357574861.dat closed at 697498 rows,size 604 MB.

output file d:\flatfile\ldrfiles1357574876.dat closed at 701379 rows,size 904 MB.

output file d:\flatfile\ldrfiles1357574891.dat closed at 692556 rows,size 1204 MB.

222868rows exported at 2013-01-08 00:08:31, size 1300 MB.

output file d:\flatfile\ldrfiles1357574906.dat closed at 222868 rows,size 1300 MB.

一共5个文件。

多文件并行测试

如果指定了parallel选项，sqlldr运行的时候会对表加4级锁，允许多个sqlldr session同时对同一个表执行加载作用。在我们执行了truncate 操作后对表进行并行加载操作。

parallelpar1文件

USERID=zdrygk/zdrygk

CONTROL='D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_1.ctl'

DATA='D:\flatfile\multifile\ldrfiles1357574846.dat'

LOG='D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_1.log'

DIRECT=true

parallel=true

ERRORS=10000

parallel par2、3、4、5的内容大致相同。

在windows下只能打开多个窗口，通过复制粘贴的方法保证并行了。

执行

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_1.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_2.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_3.par

sqlldr parfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_4.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\paral\sqlldr_paral_5.par

最后得到了5个log文件关键内容：

log1

Run began on Tue Jan 08 01:51:11 2013

Run ended on Tue Jan 08 01:51:21 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:09.42

CPU time was: 00:00:06.43

…

中间的几个log文件省略

log5

Run began on Tue Jan 08 01:51:34 2013

Run ended on Tue Jan 08 01:51:38 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:03.27

CPU time was: 00:00:02.03

因为最后一个sqlldr session 是最后一个执行结束的，所以需要计算并行sqlldr的执行消耗时间，只需要使用log5中的结束时间减去log1中的开始时间即可。

01:51:38-01:51:11=22秒

因为不是使用程序执行这几个sqlldr程序，复制、粘贴、执行之间会有空隙。真实用时应该比22秒这个数字要小的多。

多文件非并行测试

因为如果没有指定parallel选项，sqlldr运行的时候会对表加6级锁，其他sqlldr session会无法工作，所以只能串行的执行sqlldr操作。在我们执行了truncate操作之后对表进行串行加载操作。

noparallelpar1文件

USERID=zdrygk/zdrygk

CONTROL='D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_1.ctl'

DATA='D:\flatfile\multifile\ldrfiles1357574846.dat'

LOG='D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_1.log'

DIRECT=true

ERRORS=10000

noparallel par2、3、4、5的内容大致相同。

执行

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_1.par

sqlldr parfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_2.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_3.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_4.par

sqlldrparfile=D:\flatfile\multifile\nopar\sqlldr_nopar_5.par

最后得到了5个log文件关键内容：

log1

Run began on Tue Jan 08 01:47:35 2013

Run ended on Tue Jan 08 01:47:48 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:12.61

CPU time was: 00:00:06.92

…

中间的几个log文件省略

log5

Run began on Tue Jan 08 01:48:26 2013

Run ended on Tue Jan 08 01:48:30 2013

Elapsed time was: 00:00:03.68

CPU time was: 00:00:02.01

最后执行时间相加

12.61+ 12.54+ 12.09+ 11.40+ 03.68=52.32秒

总结

Load Mode	Elapsed time(ss.99)
Direct	52.32
Direct + parallel	22

sqlldr是cpu密集型的操作，并且多线程，只有在使用多个数据文件，并且开启多个sqlldr session的时候才会有效果。并且效果非常明显。在消耗更多cpu和内存的同时能够给予非常高的效率，在真实情况下与单文件加载相比效率相差有1倍以上。

陳述

本文內容由網友自願投稿，版權歸原作者所有。本站不承擔相應的法律責任。如發現涉嫌抄襲或侵權的內容，請聯絡admin@php.cn

MySQL字符串類型：存儲，性能和最佳實踐May 10, 2025 am 12:02 AM

mySqlStringTypesimpactStorageAndPerformanCeaseAsfollows：1）長度，始終使用theSamestoragespace，whatcanbefasterbutlessspace-felfficity.2）varCharisvariable varcharisvariable length，morespace-morespace-morespace-effficitybuteftife buteftife butfority butfority textifforlyslower.3）

了解MySQL字符串類型：VARCHAR，文本，char等May 10, 2025 am 12:02 AM

mysqlStringTypesIncludeVarChar，文本，char，Enum和set.1）varCharisVersAtileForvariable-lengthStringStringSuptoPuptOuptoPepePecifiedLimit.2）textisidealforlargetStortStorStoverStoverStorageWithoutAutAdefinedLength.3）charlisfixed-lenftenge，for forConsistentDatalikeCodes.4）

MySQL中的字符串數據類型是什麼？May 10, 2025 am 12:01 AM

MySQLoffersvariousstringdatatypes:1)CHARforfixed-lengthstrings,2)VARCHARforvariable-lengthtext,3)BINARYandVARBINARYforbinarydata,4)BLOBandTEXTforlargedata,and5)ENUMandSETforcontrolledinput.Eachtypehasspecificusesandperformancecharacteristics,sochoose

如何向新的MySQL用戶授予權限May 09, 2025 am 12:16 AM

TograntpermissionstonewMySQLusers,followthesesteps:1)AccessMySQLasauserwithsufficientprivileges,2)CreateanewuserwiththeCREATEUSERcommand,3)UsetheGRANTcommandtospecifypermissionslikeSELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,orALLPRIVILEGESonspecificdatabasesortables,and4)

如何在MySQL中添加用戶：逐步指南May 09, 2025 am 12:14 AM

toadduserInmysqleffect和securly，跟隨台詞：1）USEtheCreateUserStattoDaneWuser，指定thehostandastrongpassword.2）GrantNecterAryAryaryPrivilegesSustherthing privilegesgeStatement，usifementStatement，adheringtotheprinciplelastprefilegege.3）

mysql：添加具有復雜權限的新用戶May 09, 2025 am 12:09 AM

toaddanewuserwithcomplexpermissionsinmysql，loldtheSesteps：1）創建eTheEserWithCreateuser'newuser'newuser'@''localhost'Indedify'pa ssword';。 2）GrantreadAccesstoalltablesin'mydatabase'withGrantSelectOnMyDatabase.to'newuser'@'localhost';。 3）GrantWriteAccessto'

mysql：字符串數據類型和coltrationsMay 09, 2025 am 12:08 AM

MySQL中的字符串數據類型包括CHAR、VARCHAR、BINARY、VARBINARY、BLOB、TEXT，排序規則（Collations）決定了字符串的比較和排序方式。 1.CHAR適合固定長度字符串，VARCHAR適合可變長度字符串。 2.BINARY和VARBINARY用於二進制數據，BLOB和TEXT用於大對像數據。 3.排序規則如utf8mb4_unicode_ci忽略大小寫，適合用戶名；utf8mb4_bin區分大小寫，適合需要精確比較的字段。