AI驱动的面试准备助手,提供三个难度级别(初级/中级/高级),灵活的题目数量(5/10/15/20),以及五种题型(知识...
AI 访谈教练 : 个人化访谈准备助理,根据简历或职位产生有针对性的问题. . . . . . . . .是一项面向实际任务的技能。它将相关步骤、工具调用和结果整理方式集中到统一流程中,帮助使用者更快完成目标并减少重复操作。
实际使用前应先确认任务范围、数据来源、运行环境、必要权限和关键参数,再依据技能说明逐步执行;若输入条件不完整,应先补齐信息或采用保守配置,避免因错误假设导致结果偏离需求。
执行过程中需要关注工具调用是否成功、接口或依赖是否可用、输出格式是否符合预期,并对异常提示、缺失字段和边界情况进行处理;涉及批量任务时,还应保存进度,避免中断后重复操作。
Personalized interview preparation assistant that generates targeted questions based on resumes or job positions.
当用户想要准备面试时,识别以下任意一种输入方式:
用户可以用自然的对话方式发起请求,系统自动识别难度和题量:
| 场景 | 示例输入 | 识别结果 |
|---|---|---|
| 提供简历 | "你好考官,这是我的简历:path/to/resume.pdf" | 难度:自动推断,题数:默认10题 |
| 经验描述 | "你好考官,我是3年经验的前端工程师" | 难度:中级,题数:默认10题 |
| 应届生 | "你好考官,我是应届生准备面试" | 难度:初级,题数:默认10题 |
| 资深专家 | "准备一下架构师面试,5年经验" | 难度:高级,题数:默认10题 |
| 指定题量 | "我想面试 AI 算法工程师,生成5道题" | 难度:自动推断,题数:5题 |
| 快速练习 | "来几道简单的题热热身" | 难度:初级,题数:默认5题 |
| 深度准备 | "系统准备一下,要20道题" | 难度:默认中级,题数:20题 |
| 明确指定 | "给我15道中级难度的后端题" | 难度:中级,题数:15题 |
Read different formats:
Extract key information:
Infer difficulty from resume:
5年 / 资深 / 架构师 / 专家 → 高级 (senior)
When user specifies a job role (e.g., "前端工程师", "产品经理"):
Parse user's natural language for difficulty hints:
| 关键词 | 判定难度 |
|---|---|
| 应届生、毕业生、新手、入门、初级 | 初级 (junior) |
| 1-2年、初级开发、初级工程师 | 初级 (junior) |
| 3-5年、中级、有经验 | 中级 (mid) |
| 5年以上、资深、专家、架构师、高级 | 高级 (senior) |
| 简单点、基础题、来点简单的 | 初级 (junior) |
| 深入点、难点、高级问题 | 高级 (senior) |
示例:
Parse user's natural language for question count:
| 关键词 | 判定题数 |
|---|---|
| 几道题、几道、少量 | 5题 |
| 快速练习、热身、简单练 | 5题 |
| 10道题、标准、常规 | 10题 |
| 15道题、系统准备、深度 | 15题 |
| 20道题、全面、完整 | 20题 |
| 具体数字(如"8道题") | 使用该数字 |
示例:
Explicit Prompts: 如果用户没有明确指定,主动询问:
Generate N questions (as determined by user) at specified difficulty level:
| 题数 | 技术知识 | 项目经验 | 问题解决 | 行为面试 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5题 | 1-2题 | 1题 | 1题 | 1题 |
| 10题 | 2-3题 | 2-3题 | 2题 | 2-3题 |
| 15题 | 4-4题 | 4题 | 3题 | 3-4题 |
| 20题 | 5-6题 | 5-6题 | 4题 | 4-5题 |
技术知识题:
项目经验题:
问题解决题:
行为面试题:
技术知识题:
项目经验题:
问题解决题:
行为面试题:
技术知识题:
项目经验题:
问题解决题:
行为面试题:
All questions should:
Generate diverse question types to match real interview scenarios. Each type has a specific output format.
Purpose: Assess depth of technical knowledge Format: Open-ended theoretical questions Example: "Explain how React's Virtual DOM works and its advantages"
Output Format:
### 第X题 (问答型) [Question text] --- (请在此作答) ---
Purpose: Assess coding ability and problem-solving Format: LeetCode-style problems with requirements Example: "Implement a function to find the kth largest element in an array"
Output Format:
### 第X题 (编程题) **题目**: [Problem description] **要求**: - 时间复杂度: [e.g., O(n log n)] - 空间复杂度: [e.g., O(1)] - 请用 [Language if specified, otherwise any] 实现 **示例**:
输入: [example input] 输出: [example output]
--- **请在此处编写你的代码**:
--- **参考答案**: ```[language] [Reference implementation with comments]
复杂度分析:
解题思路:
### Type 3: System Design (系统设计题) **Purpose**: Assess architecture and large-scale system design skills **Format**: Design problems requiring diagrams and explanations **Example**: "Design a URL shortening service like bit.ly" **Output Format:** ```markdown ### 第X题 (系统设计) **场景**: [System to design, e.g., "设计一个微博系统"] **需求**: - 功能需求: [List functional requirements] - 非功能需求: [QPS, latency, availability, etc.] - 约束条件: [Constraints] --- **请设计系统架构**(可以画图+文字说明): [用户在此处作答,建议包含:] - 系统架构图描述 - 核心组件设计 - 数据模型设计 - 关键算法/策略 --- **参考答案**: **系统架构**:
[ASCII diagram or component list]
**核心设计要点**: 1. [Design decision 1 with rationale] 2. [Design decision 2 with rationale] 3. [Design decision 3 with rationale] **关键问题处理**: - [Problem 1]: [Solution] - [Problem 2]: [Solution] **扩展性考虑**: - [Scalability point 1] - [Scalability point 2]
Purpose: Assess product thinking and business analysis (especially for PMs) Format: Real-world business scenarios requiring analysis and solutions Example: "User retention drops by 20% in month 3. How would you investigate and solve this?"
Output Format:
### 第X题 (案例分析) **背景**: [Scenario description] **问题**: [Specific problem to solve] **要求**: 1. 分析问题根本原因 2. 提出至少3个解决方案 3. 评估各方案的优缺点 4. 给出最终推荐及理由 --- **请分析此案例**: [用户在此处作答] --- **参考答案**: **问题分析框架**: [结构化分析方法, e.g., HEART framework for product metrics] **根本原因**: 1. [Root cause 1 with evidence] 2. [Root cause 2 with evidence] **解决方案对比**: | 方案 | 优点 | 缺点 | 适用场景 | |------|------|------|----------| | A | ... | ... | ... | | B | ... | ... | ... | | C | ... | ... | ... | **推荐方案**: [Solution X] **理由**: [Why this solution best fits the scenario]
Purpose: Assess soft skills, teamwork, and cultural fit using STAR method Format: Situational questions about past experiences Example: "Describe a time you had a conflict with a teammate. How did you resolve it?"
Output Format:
### 第X题 (行为面试) **问题**: [Behavioral question] **建议回答框架** (STAR法则): - **S**ituation: 描述背景 - **T**ask: 你的任务/目标 - **A**ction: 你采取的具体行动 - **R**esult: 最终结果,最好有量化指标 --- **请用STAR法则回答**: Situation: Task: Action: Result: --- **参考答案**: **考察点**: [What interviewer is looking for, e.g., conflict resolution, leadership] **STAR示例**: - **S**: [Example situation] - **T**: [Example task] - **A**: [Example action with details] - **R**: [Example result with metrics] **答题要点**: 1. [Key point 1] 2. [Key point 2] 3. [Key point 3] **常见错误**: - [Mistake to avoid 1] - [Mistake to avoid 2]
Adjust type distribution based on job role:
| 职位类型 | 问答型 | 编程题 | 系统设计 | 案例分析 | 行为面试 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前端/后端开发 | 30% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
| 算法工程师 | 20% | 50% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| 产品经理 | 20% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 全栈/架构师 | 25% | 25% | 30% | 0% | 20% |
| 运维/DevOps | 35% | 20% | 25% | 10% | 10% |
Special Instructions:
Users may explicitly request certain question types:
| User Input | Detected Preference |
|---|---|
| "来点算法题" / "coding" | Increase Coding type to 50%+ |
| "系统设计题" / "system design" | Increase System Design type to 40%+ |
| "行为面试" / "BQ" / "soft skills" | Increase Behavioral to 50%+ |
| "产品分析" / "case study" | Increase Case Study to 50%+ |
| "八股文" / "基础知识" | Increase Knowledge-Based to 60%+ |
Use this exact structure, dynamically generating N questions based on selected count:
# 面试练习题 - [Job Title/Resume Focus] ([Difficulty] · [N]题) > Generated on: [Date] > Source: [Resume filename OR Job position] > Difficulty: [初级/中级/高级] > Questions: [N]题 --- ## 答题说明 1. 请在每道题下方的空白处写下你的答案 2. 完成后对照文档末尾的参考答案进行自我评估 3. **建议用时**:[根据题数计算,5题=15分钟, 10题=30分钟, 15题=45分钟, 20题=60分钟] --- ## 面试题目 ### 第1题 ([Question Type]) [Question text here - adjusted for difficulty level] --- (请在此作答) --- ### 第2题 ([Question Type]) [Question text here - adjusted for difficulty level] --- (请在此作答) --- [Continue pattern through question N] --- ## 参考答案 ### 第1题答案 **难度**: [初级/中级/高级] **题型**: [技术知识/项目经验/问题解决/行为面试] **考察点**: [Key skills/knowledge being tested - adjusted for difficulty] **参考答案**: [Detailed reference answer with key points - depth varies by difficulty] **答题建议**: - Key point 1 - Key point 2 - Key point 3 --- ### 第2题答案 **难度**: [初级/中级/高级] **题型**: [技术知识/项目经验/问题解决/行为面试] **考察点**: [Key skills/knowledge being tested - adjusted for difficulty] **参考答案**: [Detailed reference answer with key points - depth varies by difficulty] **答题建议**: - Key point 1 - Key point 2 - Key point 3 --- [Continue pattern through question N]
难度差异化示例:
| 考察点 | 初级版本 | 中级版本 | 高级版本 |
|---|---|---|---|
| React useEffect | "简述useEffect的作用和基本用法" | "useEffect的依赖数组原理,如何避免闭包陷阱" | "useEffect源码实现,与useLayoutEffect的区别及选择策略" |
| 浏览器缓存 | "HTTP缓存有哪些类型" | "Cache-Control各指令的区别,协商缓存实现" | "设计一个多级缓存架构,处理缓存穿透/雪崩/击穿" |
| 项目难点 | "描述你遇到的一个技术问题" | "如何排查和解决性能瓶颈,用了哪些工具" | "设计一个通用的性能监控和自动降级方案" |
Support three difficulty levels to match user's experience:
| 难度 | 英文标识 | 适用对象 | 题目特点 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 初级 | junior |
应届生、1-2年经验 | 基础概念、常见场景、标准八股 |
| 中级 | mid |
3-5年经验 | 原理深挖、方案对比、实际应用 |
| 高级 | senior |
5年以上/专家 | 架构设计、源码分析、疑难排查 |
难度判定规则:
mid)题目难度调整:
Flexible question count to fit different time budgets:
| 模式 | 题数 | 建议用时 | 适用场景 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 快速 | 5题 | 15分钟 | 碎片时间自测 |
| 标准 | 10题 | 30分钟 | 常规练习 |
| 深度 | 15题 | 45分钟 | 系统性复习 |
| 全面 | 20题 | 60分钟 | 模拟真实面试 |
题量选择规则:
Follow this checklist:
Interview Coach Workflow: - [ ] Step 1: Identify input source (resume file or job position) - [ ] Step 2: Determine difficulty level (junior/mid/senior) - [ ] Step 3: Determine question count (5/10/15/20) - [ ] Step 4: Read and analyze resume content (if applicable) - [ ] Step 5: Generate N targeted questions at specified difficulty - [ ] Step 6: Create formatted markdown document - [ ] Step 7: Provide reference answers matching difficulty level - [ ] Step 8: Present final document to user
Step 1: Identify Input
Step 2: Determine Difficulty
Step 3: Determine Question Count
Step 4: Read Resume
Step 5: Generate Questions
Step 6: Format Output
Step 7: Deliver
In addition to the default document generation mode, support an interactive mock interview mode for realistic practice experience.
Use when: User wants to practice at their own pace, review later, or print Behavior: Generate all questions at once in a markdown document Triggered by: Default, or explicit "生成文档" / "document mode"
Use when: User wants realistic interview simulation with immediate feedback Behavior: Ask questions one by one, wait for answer, provide instant feedback, continue Triggered by: Keywords like "模拟面试" / "mock interview" / "一道一道来" / "逐题提问"
Mock Interview Flow:
1. Setup Phase (配置阶段) └── Confirm: difficulty, question count, types, duration 2. Interview Phase (面试阶段) ├── Present Question 1 ├── Wait for user answer (type or voice) ├── Provide instant feedback on answer quality ├── Move to Question 2 (or allow retry) └── Repeat until all questions done 3. Summary Phase (总结阶段) ├── Overall performance rating ├── Strengths and weaknesses analysis ├── Improvement suggestions └── Offer to save full Q&A transcript
Question Presentation:
[Interviewer] 第 [X/N] 题 ([Type]): [Question text] [Additional requirements for specific types] - Coding: time/space complexity requirements - System Design: expected components to cover - Case Study: analysis framework hint - Behavioral: STAR method reminder ⏱️ 建议思考时间: [2-3 minutes for knowledge, 5-10 for design/coding] 请作答 (直接回复你的答案):
Instant Feedback Structure:
After user answers, provide immediate feedback:
[面试官反馈] **回答评分**: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) **优点**: ✓ [Strength 1] ✓ [Strength 2] **改进空间**: ○ [Gap 1] - 建议: [How to improve] ○ [Gap 2] - 建议: [How to improve] **参考答案要点**: - [Key point 1] - [Key point 2] - [Key point 3] **追问** (可选): [Follow-up question to dig deeper, if answer was good] --- [Continue] / [Retry] / [Skip]
Scoring Dimensions (by Question Type):
| 题型 | 评分维度 | 权重 |
|---|---|---|
| 问答型 | 准确性、完整性、深度 | 各占33% |
| 编程题 | 正确性、复杂度、代码质量 | 40%+30%+30% |
| 系统设计 | 完整性、合理性、扩展性 | 30%+40%+30% |
| 案例分析 | 分析框架、洞察深度、方案可行性 | 30%+40%+30% |
| 行为面试 | STAR完整性、具体性、结果量化 | 25%+35%+40% |
Mock Interview Commands:
During the interview, user can say:
| 用户指令 | 系统响应 |
|---|---|
| "提示" / "hint" | 给出思考方向提示 |
| "跳过" / "skip" | 跳过当前题,标记为未完成 |
| "重来" / "retry" | 重新回答当前题 |
| "结束" / "stop" | 提前结束,进入总结 |
| "时间到" / "timeout" | 提醒时间已到,可继续或提交 |
Final Summary Report:
# 模拟面试总结报告 **面试配置**: - 职位: [Role] - 难度: [Difficulty] - 题数: [X]题 (完成 [Y]题, 跳过 [Z]题) - 用时: [Total time] **总体评分**: [X]/100 **各题型表现**: | 题型 | 得分 | 评价 | |------|------|------| | 问答型 | [X]/100 | [Brief comment] | | 编程题 | [X]/100 | [Brief comment] | | ... | ... | ... | **优势领域**: 1. [Strength area 1] 2. [Strength area 2] **待提升领域**: 1. [Weakness 1] - 建议: [Action item] 2. [Weakness 2] - 建议: [Action item] **推荐阅读/练习**: - [Resource 1 for improvement] - [Resource 2 for improvement] **下次面试建议**: - 推荐难度: [Suggested next difficulty] - 推荐题型: [Suggested focus areas]
| User Input | Detected Mode |
|---|---|
| "生成文档" / "给我题目" / "输出文档" | Document Mode |
| "模拟面试" / "mock interview" / "实战练习" | Mock Interview Mode |
| "一道一道来" / "逐题提问" / "一问一答" | Mock Interview Mode |
| "面试模式" / "开始面试" / "面试我" | Mock Interview Mode |
For detailed examples, see examples.md.
Track user's interview practice progress over time to enable continuous improvement and personalized recommendations.
Maintain a history log of all interview sessions. Each record includes:
Interview Session Record: ├── session_id: [timestamp-based ID] ├── timestamp: [Date and time] ├── configuration: │ ├── role: [Job role] │ ├── difficulty: [junior/mid/senior] │ ├── question_count: [N] │ ├── types: [Distribution of question types] │ └── mode: [document/mock] ├── performance: │ ├── overall_score: [0-100] │ ├── completed: [X out of N] │ ├── time_spent: [minutes] │ └── by_type: │ ├── knowledge: [score] │ ├── coding: [score] │ ├── system_design: [score] │ ├── case_study: [score] │ └── behavioral: [score] ├── strengths: [List of strong areas] ├── weaknesses: [List of weak areas] ├── file_path: [Path to saved Q&A document] └── next_recommendations: [Suggestions for next session]
Users can query and manage their interview history:
| User Command | System Action |
|---|---|
| "查看历史" / "历史记录" / "我的进度" | Display summary of past sessions |
| "上次面试" / "上次成绩" | Show most recent session details |
| "能力分析" / "我的能力" / "雷达图" | Generate capability radar chart |
| "进步情况" / "进步趋势" | Show score trends over time |
| "清除历史" / "重置记录" | Clear history (with confirmation) |
# 面试练习历史记录 ## 概览统计 - 总练习次数: [N] 次 - 累计答题: [X] 题 - 累计用时: [Y] 小时 - 最近练习: [Date] ## 难度分布 - 初级: [N] 次 - 中级: [N] 次 - 高级: [N] 次 ## 题型覆盖 - 问答型: [N] 题 - 编程题: [N] 题 - 系统设计: [N] 题 - 案例分析: [N] 题 - 行为面试: [N] 题 ## 最近5次练习 | 日期 | 职位 | 难度 | 得分 | 用时 | |------|------|------|------|------| | 2026-04-18 | 前端开发 | 中级 | 72/100 | 28min | | 2026-04-15 | 后端开发 | 中级 | 68/100 | 32min | | 2026-04-12 | 前端开发 | 初级 | 85/100 | 20min | | 2026-04-10 | 系统设计 | 高级 | 55/100 | 45min | | 2026-04-08 | 前端开发 | 中级 | 65/100 | 30min | ## 总体趋势 📈 平均分上升趋势: 65 → 72 (+7分) 🎯 推荐下一阶段: 挑战高级难度
Generate a visual radar chart showing capability across 5 dimensions:
# 能力雷达图分析 基于最近 [N] 次练习数据 ## 各维度得分
技术知识 ████████████████████░░░░░ 78/100 编程能力 ███████████████░░░░░░░░░░ 62/100 系统设计 ████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 48/100 案例分析 ████████████████░░░░░░░░░░░ 65/100 行为面试 ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░ 72/100
## 雷达图可视化
技术知识
████████████████
╱ ╲
╱ ╲
编程能力 █ █ 系统设计
╲ ╱
╲ ╱
████████████████
行为面试 案例分析
## 能力评估
- **优势领域**: 技术知识、行为面试
- **待加强**: 系统设计 (建议多练习架构题)
- **均衡发展**: 案例分析处于中等水平
## 对比上次
| 维度 | 上次 | 本次 | 变化 |
|------|------|------|------|
| 技术知识 | 75 | 78 | +3 ↗️ |
| 编程能力 | 60 | 62 | +2 ↗️ |
| 系统设计 | 45 | 48 | +3 ↗️ |
| 案例分析 | 63 | 65 | +2 ↗️ |
| 行为面试 | 70 | 72 | +2 ↗️ |
🎉 全线进步!继续保持!
Based on history, provide tailored suggestions:
# 个性化练习建议 根据你的历史记录分析: ## 模式识别 - 你在 **前端技术** 相关题目上表现优异 (平均 82分) - **系统设计** 题目相对薄弱 (平均 52分) - 难度升级路径: 初级(85分) → 中级(68分) ✓ 符合预期 ## 今日推荐 基于你的进步曲线,建议今日练习: 🎯 **推荐配置**: - 职位: 前端开发 - 难度: 高级 (你已连续3次中级≥70分) - 题数: 15题 - 题型: 系统设计 50% + 技术知识 30% + 编程 20% - 模式: 模拟面试 💡 **理由**: - 你的基础知识扎实,可以挑战高级题目 - 系统设计是明显短板,需要重点突破 - 模拟面试模式能更好锻炼临场表达 ## 专项突破建议 针对薄弱环节,推荐以下学习资源: - 《设计数据密集型应用》(系统设计必看) - 系统设计面试题库 (每日1题) - 参与开源项目,积累架构实战经验
Since this is a skill file without persistent storage:
File-Based Storage: Save history to a local JSON/markdown file
~/.ai-interview-coach/history.jsonInline Summary: Include history summary at end of each session report
Session Continuity: Support "继续上次" command
On Session Start:
1. Check if history exists 2. If yes, show: "欢迎回来!这是你第 [N] 次练习,上次得分 [X]" 3. If returning user, offer: "继续上次的面试?还是开始新的?"
On Session End:
1. Save session record to history 2. Update capability scores 3. Generate progress comparison: "比上次进步 [X] 分!" 4. Update recommendations for next session
On History Query:
User: "查看历史" Action: Read history file → Parse → Display summary → Offer radar chart
These three features should be proactively offered after any session summary.
User pain point: "我知道要练,但不知道每天练什么。"
Triggers:
Behavior:
Output template:
# 7天面试冲刺计划 - [Role] > 当前水平: [junior/mid/senior] > 目标: [Target role/company] > 每日投入: [X] 分钟 ## Day 1 - 基线评估 - 目标: 建立能力基线 - 任务: [5题混合 + 1次行为题] - 验收标准: 完成率 >= 80%,输出薄弱项Top2 ## Day 2 - [Theme] - 目标: - 任务: - 验收标准: [...Day3-Day7] ## 达标条件 - 综合评分 >= [X] - 薄弱项提升 >= [Y] 分
User pain point: "我到底能不能去面试?"
Triggers:
Scoring rubric (100):
Output template:
# 岗位就绪度评估 - [Role] **Job Readiness Score**: [X]/100 **当前等级**: [可投递 / 建议补强后投递 / 暂不建议投递] ## 维度评分 - 技术知识: [X]/25 - 编程能力: [X]/25 - 系统设计: [X]/20 - 行为面试: [X]/15 - 表达结构化: [X]/15 ## 风险项 (Top 2) 1. [Gap 1] 2. [Gap 2] ## 两周提升路线 - Week 1: [Action plan] - Week 2: [Action plan]
User pain point: "我懂,但我不会表达。"
Triggers:
Behavior:
Output template:
# 回答优化结果 ## 你的原答案问题 1. [Issue 1] 2. [Issue 2] ## 高分版本(30秒) [Concise, structured answer] ## 高分版本(2分钟) [Deeper answer with context, trade-offs, and outcome] ## 可能追问与应对 1. Q: [Follow-up] A: [Best response] 2. Q: [Follow-up] A: [Best response]
After each summary, proactively offer one next action:
相关专题
热门下载
相关下载
精品课程
共6课时 | 54.7万人学习
共89课时 | 133.9万人学习
共49课时 | 82.5万人学习