这样写是对的
<li ng-repeat="(x, y) in item" ng-if="x!='a'"></li>
这样写就是输出全部的,ng-if并没有执行
<li ng-repeat="(x, y) in item" ng-if="test()"></li>
...
$scope.test = function(){
return "x!='a'"
}
漂亮男人2017-05-15 17:06:14
Firstly, you did not pass x in, and secondly, what you returned was a string, and the string is always correct. Try writing it like this:
<li ng-repeat="(x, y) in item" ng-if="test(x)"></li>
$scope.test = function(x){
return x!='a';
}
为情所困2017-05-15 17:06:14
Tell you a concept, the things in ng-if are called angular expressions, and angular will parse this expression. "x!='a'"
is actually $scope.x != 'a'
. By the way, this $scope
is < The scope generated by code>ng-repeat. "x!='a'"
其实就是$scope.x != 'a'
,顺带一提这个$scope
是ng-repeat
产生的scope。
下面的test()
当然会变parse成$scope.test()
在ngRepeat的scope中没找到方法,所以从父scope中找到了你的方法, 然后你的方法return的是一个字符串, 所以判断永远是true
The following test()
will of course be parsed into $scope.test()
. No method was found in the scope of ngRepeat, so you found your method from the parent scope. , then your method returns a string, so the judgment is always true
.