Home  >  Q&A  >  body text

MySQL数据表中,用户id这样的自增字段,应该是数字型还是字符型?各有什么优缺点?

如题,设计一张表,id这种自增字段该怎么选择类型?

大家讲道理大家讲道理2742 days ago659

reply all(2)I'll reply

  • PHP中文网

    PHP中文网2017-04-17 15:53:39

    Use self-increasing integers.

    id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT

    id is generally not a negative number, so use UNSIGNED. id一般来说不会是负数,所以用UNSIGNED
    id相当于身份证,不应该也不能是NULL。
    至于为什么是整数,和两个因素有关:

    1. 占用空间。

    2. 效率。

    3. MySQL的AUTO_INCREMENT不支持字符型。
      占用空间不用多说, INT类型固定只占用4个字节,能表示的范围达到了-2^31 (-2,147,483,648) 到 2^31 – 1 (2,147,483,647) ,设为非负之后翻倍,而使用字符串想要表示这么大量的数据...

    效率则和索引的结构有关,MySQL使用B+树作为索引的数据结构,如果使用自增整数的话,插入数据时最多只会引起节点的分裂,而使用字符串则有可能会插入到任何地方,这意味着可能会引起节点的移动和分裂id is equivalent to an ID card and should not and cannot be NULL.

    As for why it is an integer, it is related to two factors:


    1. Takes up space.

    2. Efficiency.

    3. 🎜MySQL's AUTO_INCREMENT does not support character types. 🎜Needless to say, it takes up space. The INT type only occupies 4 bytes, and the representable range reaches -2^31 (-2,147,483,648) to 2 ^31 – 1 (2,147,483,647) , doubled after being set to non-negative, and using strings to represent such a large amount of data...🎜
    🎜Efficiency is related to the structure of the index. MySQL uses B+ tree as the data structure of the index. If you use auto-increasing integers, inserting data will only cause splitting of nodes at most. , and using strings may be inserted anywhere, which means that it may cause moving and splitting of nodes. Secondly, during data query, string comparison is slower than integer comparison. 🎜 🎜For more information, please refer to this: 🎜Will auto-incrementing primary keys reduce database insert performance? If so, why do so many companies still use it? 🎜 🎜Finally: I support that the primary key has nothing to do with the specific data = =.. So using integers as the primary key is a better choice. 🎜

    reply
    0
  • PHP中文网

    PHP中文网2017-04-17 15:53:39

    Numerical type for convenient indexing

    reply
    0
  • Cancelreply