Home  >  Q&A  >  body text

python - 同样都是表示十六进制,'0x2d'和'\x2d'有什么区别

如题,这两种表示方法有什么区别。都在什么情况下使用

迷茫迷茫2742 days ago870

reply all(4)I'll reply

  • PHP中文网

    PHP中文网2017-04-17 13:06:10

    '0x20' is a multi-character character constant and its corresponding value is 0x30783230

    (注: '0' 'x' '2' 的 ascii 码分别是 0x30 0x78 0x32)
    

    'x20' is a char and its value is 0x20

    (注: '\x[0-9a-fA-F]{1,2}' 用16进制表示一个char 比如 '\xFF'
         '\[0-7]{1,3}' 用8进制表示一个char 比如 '0' )
    

    $ cat 1.c

    #include <stdio.h>
    
    int main() {
      int a = '0x20';
      int b = '\x20';
      printf("a = 0x%x\n", a);
      printf("b = 0x%x\n", b);
      return 0;
    }
    

    $ gcc -Wall 1.c

    1.c:4:11: warning: multi-character character constant [-Wmultichar]
       int a = '0x20';
               ^
    

    $ ./a.out

    a = 0x30783230
    b = 0x20
    

    reply
    0
  • PHP中文网

    PHP中文网2017-04-17 13:06:10

    You can think that '0x2d' is a syntax error and 'x2d' is the correct way of writing.

    Specifically, '0x2d' is not a char, but an int. Its value is 0x30783264 or 0x64327830. Which one depends on the implementation.

    The C standard says this:

    3.1.3.4 Character Constants Semantics
    An integer charcter constant has type int [note that it has type char in C++]...The value of an integer character constant containing more than one character...is implementation-defined.

    Note that it mentions that the type of this thing in C++ is char. As far as I know, at least VC supports writing like this: 'xe5xadx97', which is a UTF-8 encoded "word".

    reply
    0
  • 黄舟

    黄舟2017-04-17 13:06:10

    'x2d' is mainly used to represent the encoding of a single-byte character that cannot be displayed directly

    '0x2d' should be regarded as a standard hexadecimal string, which can be converted to an int type value through int('0x2d', 16)

    reply
    0
  • 阿神

    阿神2017-04-17 13:06:10

    '0x2d' is a string containing 4 characters, 'x2d' represents the character '-' (its ASCII value is 0x2d=45).

    reply
    0
  • Cancelreply