search

Home  >  Q&A  >  body text

Using @property in styled components: a guide

I want to use animation in my application but it requires @property function in SCSS:

@property --border-angle {
  syntax: "<angle>";
  inherits: true;
  initial-value: 0turn;
}

Is there a way to do this in a styled component?

The complete code of the animation is located at: https://codepen.io/shshaw/pen/RwJwJJx

Or how to rewrite this function so that it does not have to use the property function?

P粉808697471P粉808697471243 days ago401

reply all(1)I'll reply

  • P粉132730839

    P粉1327308392024-03-29 12:39:50

    As I tested, the code posted does seem to work with styled-components, although browser support for @property still seems to be limited , for example it works on Chrome, but currently not on Firefox, so the gradient animation won't play on it.

    I tried creating an alternative version of the posted code without using @property and it also works on Firefox. If it helps, here's a demo: stackblitz< /a> (code included at the end of the answer).

    The code originally posted was tested using the following example: stackblitz< /a> (Firefox does not currently support gradient animations for @property).

    // Styled components
    const Container = styled.div`
      height: 100%;
      background: #223;
      display: grid;
      place-items: center;
    `;
    
    const Box = styled.div`
      --border-size: 3px;
      --border-angle: 0turn;
      width: 60vmin;
      height: 50vmin;
      background-image: conic-gradient(
          from var(--border-angle),
          #213,
          #112 50%,
          #213
        ),
        conic-gradient(from var(--border-angle), transparent 20%, #08f, #f03);
      background-size: calc(100% - (var(--border-size) * 2))
          calc(100% - (var(--border-size) * 2)),
        cover;
      background-position: center center;
      background-repeat: no-repeat;
      animation: bg-spin 3s linear infinite;
      @keyframes bg-spin {
        to {
          --border-angle: 1turn;
        }
      }
      &:hover {
        animation-play-state: paused;
      }
      @property --border-angle {
        syntax: "";
        inherits: true;
        initial-value: 0turn;
      }
    `;
    
    export default function App() {
      return (
        
          
        
      );
    }

    Below is an alternative version without @property for comparison, which uses pseudo-elements and adds child div to recreate the animation in styled-components .

    Live Demo: stackblitz (should also work for Firefox).

    // Styled components
    const Container = styled.div`
      min-height: 100vh;
      background: #223;
      display: grid;
      place-items: center;
    `;
    
    const Box = styled.div`
      width: 60vmin;
      height: 50vmin;
      position: relative;
      overflow: hidden;
      &::before {
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        inset: 0;
        background-image: conic-gradient(from 0turn, transparent 20%, #08f, #f03);
        animation: fallback-spin 3s linear infinite;
      }
      @keyframes fallback-spin {
        to {
          transform: scale(1000%) rotate(1turn);
        }
      }
      &:hover::before {
        animation-play-state: paused;
      }
      &:hover > div::before {
        animation-play-state: paused;
      }
    `;
    
    const Fallback = styled.div`
      position: absolute;
      inset: 3px;
      overflow: hidden;
      background-color: pink;
      &::before {
        content: "";
        position: absolute;
        inset: 0;
        background-image: conic-gradient(from 0turn, #213, #112 50%, #213);
        animation: fallback-spin 3s linear infinite;
      }
      @keyframes fallback-spin {
        to {
          transform: scale(1000%) rotate(1turn);
        }
      }
    `;
    
    export default function App() {
      return (
        
          
            
          
        
      );
    }
    By the way,

    @property is the newer standard CSS. For more background information on @property, see MDN.

    reply
    0
  • Cancelreply