I want to force us to always type destructuring objects inline instead of creating a separate type definition. For example, for React components, I want to force all of our code to use this pattern:
const SomeComponent = ({ foo, bar }: { foo: string, bar: boolean }) => { return... }
instead of:
type Props = { foo: string, bar: boolean, }; const SomeComponent = ({ foo, bar }: Props} => { return... }
I checked the ESLint rules and didn't find anything similar. Does anyone have any suggestions?
P粉5305192342024-02-27 18:49:03
As far as I know - there are currently no existing lint rules that enforce this mode.
You can enforce lint rules using no-restricted-syntax
(Example), but as the comments in your post suggest - this Not a good idea.
It is not possible to create a selector that only matches "reactive function components" because reactive function components are just functions. So (as my example shows) this simple approach will create a lot of noise and false positives in your codebase - which is bad because it creates noise for your team.
You can create custom rules <来减少误报率, but you can never really make this number zero.
BTW - this coding style is not good as it goes against industry conventions. It is very common and popular to define a separate type so that it can be imported into a consumer and combined with other types - for example when creating higher-order or wrapper components.
By always defining the type inline, you make it harder because you have no choice but to get the prop type via Params<typeof MyComponent>[0]
.