P粉9738995672023-08-21 11:26:01
UPD: 2017-03-31, MySQL version 5.7.5 has the ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY switch enabled by default (therefore, non-deterministic GROUP BY queries are disabled). Additionally, they updated the GROUP BY implementation and the solution may no longer work as expected even with the switch disabled. An inspection is required.
Bill Karwin's solution works well when the number of items within the group is small, but the performance of the query becomes worse when the group is larger because the solution takes about n*n/2 n/2
timesIS NULL
Comparison.
I tested on an InnoDB table containing 18684446
rows and 1182
groups. This table contains test results for functional tests, and (test_id, request_id)
is the primary key. So test_id
is a group and I'm looking for the last request_id
for each test_id
.
Bill's solution has been running on my Dell e4310 for a few hours now and I don't know when it will be complete, although it operates on a covering index (hence the using index
shown in EXPLAIN ).
I also have several solutions based on the same idea:
(group_id, item_value)
pair in each group_id
is that of each group_id
The last value, if we traverse the index in descending order, is the first value for each group_id
;3 ways MySQL uses indexes is a good article to learn some details.
Solution 1
This solution is very fast, taking about 0.8 seconds for my 18 million rows of data:
SELECT test_id, MAX(request_id) AS request_id FROM testresults GROUP BY test_id DESC;
If you want to change the order to ascending order, put it into a subquery, return only the ID, and join it as a subquery with other columns:
SELECT test_id, request_id FROM ( SELECT test_id, MAX(request_id) AS request_id FROM testresults GROUP BY test_id DESC) as ids ORDER BY test_id;
For my data, this solution takes about 1.2 seconds.
Solution 2
Here is another solution, for my table it takes about 19 seconds:
SELECT test_id, request_id FROM testresults, (SELECT @group:=NULL) as init WHERE IF(IFNULL(@group, -1)=@group:=test_id, 0, 1) ORDER BY test_id DESC, request_id DESC
It also returns test results in descending order. It's slower because it does a full index scan, but it can give you an idea of how to output the N maximum rows for each group.
The disadvantage of this query is that its results cannot be cached by the query.
P粉2677913262023-08-21 09:55:33
MySQL 8.0 now supports window functions, as are nearly all popular SQL implementations. Using this standard syntax, we can write a max-n-per-group query:
WITH ranked_messages AS ( SELECT m.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY name ORDER BY id DESC) AS rn FROM messages AS m ) SELECT * FROM ranked_messages WHERE rn = 1;
The MySQL manual demonstrates this method and other methods of finding the grouped largest row.
The following is the original answer I wrote for this question in 2009:
I wrote the solution like this:
SELECT m1.* FROM messages m1 LEFT JOIN messages m2 ON (m1.name = m2.name AND m1.id < m2.id) WHERE m2.id IS NULL;
Regarding performance, depending on the nature of the data, one of the solutions may be better. Therefore, you should test both queries and choose the better one based on the performance of your database.
For example, I have a copy of the StackOverflow August data dump. I will use it for benchmarking. There are 1,114,357 rows of data in the Posts
table. This is running MySQL 5.0.75 on my Macbook Pro 2.40GHz.
I will write a query to find the latest posts for a given user ID (mine).
First used Eric's technique of using GROUP BY
in a subquery:
SELECT p1.postid FROM Posts p1 INNER JOIN (SELECT pi.owneruserid, MAX(pi.postid) AS maxpostid FROM Posts pi GROUP BY pi.owneruserid) p2 ON (p1.postid = p2.maxpostid) WHERE p1.owneruserid = 20860; 1行结果(1分17.89秒)
Even EXPLAIN
Analysis takes more than 16 seconds:
+----+-------------+------------+--------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+--------------+---------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+------------+--------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+--------------+---------+-------------+ | 1 | PRIMARY | <derived2> | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 76756 | | | 1 | PRIMARY | p1 | eq_ref | PRIMARY,PostId,OwnerUserId | PRIMARY | 8 | p2.maxpostid | 1 | Using where | | 2 | DERIVED | pi | index | NULL | OwnerUserId | 8 | NULL | 1151268 | Using index | +----+-------------+------------+--------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+--------------+---------+-------------+ 3行结果(16.09秒)
Now using LEFT JOIN
Using MY TECHNIQUEproduces the same query results:
SELECT p1.postid FROM Posts p1 LEFT JOIN posts p2 ON (p1.owneruserid = p2.owneruserid AND p1.postid < p2.postid) WHERE p2.postid IS NULL AND p1.owneruserid = 20860; 1行结果(0.28秒)
EXPLAIN
Analysis shows that both tables can use their indexes:
+----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+--------------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+--------------------------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | p1 | ref | OwnerUserId | OwnerUserId | 8 | const | 1384 | Using index | | 1 | SIMPLE | p2 | ref | PRIMARY,PostId,OwnerUserId | OwnerUserId | 8 | const | 1384 | Using where; Using index; Not exists | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+--------------------------------------+ 2行结果(0.00秒)
This is the DDL for my Posts
table:
CREATE TABLE `posts` ( `PostId` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `PostTypeId` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL, `AcceptedAnswerId` bigint(20) unsigned default NULL, `ParentId` bigint(20) unsigned default NULL, `CreationDate` datetime NOT NULL, `Score` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `ViewCount` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `Body` text NOT NULL, `OwnerUserId` bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL, `OwnerDisplayName` varchar(40) default NULL, `LastEditorUserId` bigint(20) unsigned default NULL, `LastEditDate` datetime default NULL, `LastActivityDate` datetime default NULL, `Title` varchar(250) NOT NULL default '', `Tags` varchar(150) NOT NULL default '', `AnswerCount` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `CommentCount` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `FavoriteCount` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `ClosedDate` datetime default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`PostId`), UNIQUE KEY `PostId` (`PostId`), KEY `PostTypeId` (`PostTypeId`), KEY `AcceptedAnswerId` (`AcceptedAnswerId`), KEY `OwnerUserId` (`OwnerUserId`), KEY `LastEditorUserId` (`LastEditorUserId`), KEY `ParentId` (`ParentId`), CONSTRAINT `posts_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`PostTypeId`) REFERENCES `posttypes` (`PostTypeId`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB;
Commenter Note: If you want to run another benchmark using a different version of MySQL, a different data set, or a different table design, feel free to do it yourself. I've demonstrated the above technique. The purpose of Stack Overflow is to show you how to do software development work, not to do all the work for you.