我是angularjs的一个新手，今天在项目中遇到这样的一个问题
我想在1S种以后给p隐藏掉，但是一直没效果，
求解，为什么一直没反应
<p ng-show="on">111</p>
app.controller('myinfoCtrl', ['$scope'],function($scope) {
$scope.on=true;
setTimeout(function(){
console.log($scope.on)
$scope.on=false;
console.log($scope.on)
},1000)
}
世界只因有你2017-05-15 17:11:02
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html ng-app="app">
<head>
<title></title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="angular.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-controller="myinfoCtrl">
<p ng-show="on">111</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller('myinfoCtrl', ['$scope',function($scope) {
$scope.on=true;
setTimeout(function(){
console.log($scope.on)
$scope.on=false;
$scope.$apply();
console.log($scope.on)
},1000)
}]);
</script>
</body>
</html>You need to manually call $scope.$apply();
in the callback functionOr use $timeout
http://www.cnblogs.com/ys-ys/...
Hope to adopt it, thank you
某草草2017-05-15 17:11:02
Use $timeout:
app.controller('myinfoCtrl', ['$scope','$timeout'],function($scope,$timeout) {
$scope.on=true;
$timeout(function(){
$scope.on=false;
},1000)
}
Changing the variables bound in $scope directly in setTimeout will not trigger the dirty data check of the variables. Variable changes will not be synchronized to the interface, so the interface will not make changes.
PHPz2017-05-15 17:11:02
I have never used setTimeout, but changing setTimeout to $timeout can achieve the effect you mentioned
PHP中文网2017-05-15 17:11:02
<p ng-show="on">111</p>
app.controller('myinfoCtrl', ['$scope'],function($scope) {
$scope.on=true;
setTimeout(function(){
$scope.$apply(function(){
$scope.on=false;
});
},1000)}
Using setTimeout will not trigger the $digest loop. It is recommended to use the $timeout packaged in angular
