Rumah > Artikel > pembangunan bahagian belakang > Melaksanakan Sistem Pemprosesan Pesanan: Bahagian Aliran Kerja Temporal Lanjutan
Selamat datang kembali ke siri kami untuk melaksanakan sistem pemprosesan pesanan yang canggih! Dalam catatan kami sebelum ini, kami meletakkan asas untuk projek kami, menyediakan API CRUD asas, menyepadukan dengan pangkalan data Postgres dan melaksanakan aliran kerja Temporal yang mudah. Hari ini, kami menyelam lebih dalam ke dalam dunia aliran kerja Temporal untuk mencipta sistem pemprosesan pesanan yang teguh dan berskala.
Dalam Bahagian 1, kami:
Dalam siaran ini, kami akan mengembangkan penggunaan Temporal kami dengan ketara, meneroka konsep lanjutan dan melaksanakan aliran kerja yang kompleks. Pada penghujung artikel ini, anda akan dapat:
Jom selami!
Sebelum kita memulakan pengekodan, mari semak beberapa konsep Temporal utama yang akan menjadi penting untuk pelaksanaan lanjutan kita.
Dalam Temporal, Aliran Kerja ialah fungsi tahan lama yang mengatur logik perniagaan yang berjalan lama. Aliran kerja adalah tahan terhadap kesalahan dan boleh bertahan dalam proses dan kegagalan mesin. Ia boleh dianggap sebagai mekanisme penyelarasan yang boleh dipercayai untuk peralihan keadaan aplikasi anda.
Aktiviti, sebaliknya, adalah bahan binaan aliran kerja. Mereka mewakili satu tindakan atau tugas yang jelas dan jelas, seperti membuat panggilan API, menulis ke pangkalan data atau menghantar e-mel. Aktiviti boleh dicuba semula secara bebas daripada aliran kerja yang memanggilnya.
Apabila aliran kerja dilaksanakan, Temporal mengekalkan sejarah semua peristiwa yang berlaku sepanjang hayatnya. Sejarah ini adalah sumber kebenaran untuk keadaan aliran kerja. Jika pekerja aliran kerja gagal dan dimulakan semula, ia boleh membina semula keadaan aliran kerja dengan memainkan semula sejarah ini.
Pendekatan penyumberan acara ini membolehkan Temporal memberikan jaminan ketekalan yang kukuh dan membolehkan ciri seperti versi aliran kerja dan diteruskan seperti baharu.
Temporal direka untuk mengendalikan proses yang boleh berjalan untuk tempoh yang panjang - dari minit ke hari atau bahkan bulan. Ia menyediakan mekanisme seperti degupan jantung untuk aktiviti yang berjalan lama dan berterusan seperti baharu untuk aliran kerja yang menjana sejarah yang besar.
Apabila sistem anda berkembang, anda mungkin perlu mengemas kini definisi aliran kerja. Temporal menyediakan keupayaan versi yang membolehkan anda membuat perubahan tanpa putus pada aliran kerja tanpa menjejaskan kejadian yang sedang berjalan.
Corak Saga ialah satu cara untuk mengurus ketekalan data merentas perkhidmatan mikro dalam senario transaksi yang diedarkan. Ia amat berguna apabila anda perlu mengekalkan konsistensi merentas pelbagai perkhidmatan tanpa menggunakan transaksi ACID teragih. Temporal menyediakan rangka kerja yang sangat baik untuk melaksanakan saga.
Sekarang kami telah membincangkan konsep ini, mari mula melaksanakan aliran kerja pemprosesan pesanan lanjutan kami.
Mari mereka bentuk aliran kerja pemprosesan pesanan berbilang langkah yang merangkumi pengesahan pesanan, pemprosesan pembayaran, pengurusan inventori dan pengaturan penghantaran. Kami akan melaksanakan setiap langkah ini sebagai aktiviti berasingan yang diselaraskan oleh aliran kerja.
Pertama, mari kita tentukan aktiviti kita:
// internal/workflow/activities.go package workflow import ( "context" "errors" "go.temporal.io/sdk/activity" "github.com/yourusername/order-processing-system/internal/db" ) type OrderActivities struct { queries *db.Queries } func NewOrderActivities(queries *db.Queries) *OrderActivities { return &OrderActivities{queries: queries} } func (a *OrderActivities) ValidateOrder(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { // Implement order validation logic if order.TotalAmount <= 0 { return errors.New("invalid order amount") } // Add more validation as needed return nil } func (a *OrderActivities) ProcessPayment(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { // Implement payment processing logic // This could involve calling a payment gateway API activity.GetLogger(ctx).Info("Processing payment", "orderId", order.ID, "amount", order.TotalAmount) // Simulate payment processing // In a real scenario, you'd integrate with a payment gateway here return nil } func (a *OrderActivities) UpdateInventory(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { // Implement inventory update logic // This could involve updating stock levels in the database activity.GetLogger(ctx).Info("Updating inventory", "orderId", order.ID) // Simulate inventory update // In a real scenario, you'd update your inventory management system here return nil } func (a *OrderActivities) ArrangeShipping(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { // Implement shipping arrangement logic // This could involve calling a shipping provider's API activity.GetLogger(ctx).Info("Arranging shipping", "orderId", order.ID) // Simulate shipping arrangement // In a real scenario, you'd integrate with a shipping provider here return nil }
Sekarang, mari laksanakan aliran kerja pemprosesan pesanan kami yang kompleks:
// internal/workflow/order_workflow.go package workflow import ( "time" "go.temporal.io/sdk/workflow" "github.com/yourusername/order-processing-system/internal/db" ) func OrderWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderWorkflow started", "OrderID", order.ID) // Activity options activityOptions := workflow.ActivityOptions{ StartToCloseTimeout: time.Minute, RetryPolicy: &temporal.RetryPolicy{ InitialInterval: time.Second, BackoffCoefficient: 2.0, MaximumInterval: time.Minute, MaximumAttempts: 5, }, } ctx = workflow.WithActivityOptions(ctx, activityOptions) // Step 1: Validate Order err := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ValidateOrder, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { logger.Error("Order validation failed", "OrderID", order.ID, "Error", err) return err } // Step 2: Process Payment err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ProcessPayment, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { logger.Error("Payment processing failed", "OrderID", order.ID, "Error", err) return err } // Step 3: Update Inventory err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.UpdateInventory, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { logger.Error("Inventory update failed", "OrderID", order.ID, "Error", err) // In case of inventory update failure, we might need to refund the payment // This is where the saga pattern becomes useful, which we'll cover later return err } // Step 4: Arrange Shipping err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ArrangeShipping, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { logger.Error("Shipping arrangement failed", "OrderID", order.ID, "Error", err) // If shipping fails, we might need to revert inventory and refund payment return err } logger.Info("OrderWorkflow completed successfully", "OrderID", order.ID) return nil }
Aliran kerja ini menyelaraskan berbilang aktiviti, setiap satu mewakili satu langkah dalam pemprosesan pesanan kami. Perhatikan cara kami menggunakan aliran kerja.ExecuteActivity untuk menjalankan setiap aktiviti, menghantar data pesanan mengikut keperluan.
Kami juga telah menyediakan pilihan aktiviti dengan dasar cuba semula. Ini bermakna jika aktiviti gagal (cth., disebabkan isu rangkaian sementara), Temporal akan mencuba semula secara automatik berdasarkan dasar kami yang ditentukan.
Dalam bahagian seterusnya, kami akan meneroka cara mengendalikan proses yang berjalan lama dalam struktur aliran kerja ini.
In real-world scenarios, some of our activities might take a long time to complete. For example, payment processing might need to wait for bank confirmation, or shipping arrangement might depend on external logistics systems. Temporal provides several mechanisms to handle such long-running processes effectively.
For activities that might run for extended periods, it’s crucial to implement heartbeats. Heartbeats allow an activity to report its progress and let Temporal know that it’s still alive and working. If an activity fails to heartbeat within the expected interval, Temporal can mark it as failed and potentially retry it.
Let’s modify our ArrangeShipping activity to include heartbeats:
func (a *OrderActivities) ArrangeShipping(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := activity.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("Arranging shipping", "orderId", order.ID) // Simulate a long-running process for i := 0; i < 10; i++ { // Simulate work time.Sleep(time.Second) // Record heartbeat activity.RecordHeartbeat(ctx, i) // Check if we need to cancel if activity.GetInfo(ctx).Attempt > 1 { logger.Info("Cancelling shipping arrangement due to retry", "orderId", order.ID) return nil } } logger.Info("Shipping arranged", "orderId", order.ID) return nil }
In this example, we’re simulating a long-running process with a loop. We record a heartbeat in each iteration, allowing Temporal to track the activity’s progress.
For workflows that run for very long periods or accumulate a large history, Temporal provides the “continue-as-new” feature. This allows you to complete the current workflow execution and immediately start a new execution with the same workflow ID, carrying over any necessary state.
Here’s an example of how we might use continue-as-new in a long-running order tracking workflow:
func LongRunningOrderTrackingWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, orderID string) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) // Set up a timer for how long we want this workflow execution to run timerFired := workflow.NewTimer(ctx, 24*time.Hour) // Set up a selector to wait for either the timer to fire or the order to be delivered selector := workflow.NewSelector(ctx) var orderDelivered bool selector.AddFuture(timerFired, func(f workflow.Future) { // Timer fired, we'll continue-as-new logger.Info("24 hours passed, continuing as new", "orderID", orderID) workflow.NewContinueAsNewError(ctx, LongRunningOrderTrackingWorkflow, orderID) }) selector.AddReceive(workflow.GetSignalChannel(ctx, "orderDelivered"), func(c workflow.ReceiveChannel, more bool) { c.Receive(ctx, &orderDelivered) logger.Info("Order delivered signal received", "orderID", orderID) }) selector.Select(ctx) if orderDelivered { logger.Info("Order tracking completed, order delivered", "orderID", orderID) return nil } // If we reach here, it means we're continuing as new return workflow.NewContinueAsNewError(ctx, LongRunningOrderTrackingWorkflow, orderID) }
In this example, we set up a workflow that tracks an order for delivery. It runs for 24 hours before using continue-as-new to start a fresh execution. This prevents the workflow history from growing too large over extended periods.
By leveraging these techniques, we can handle long-running processes effectively in our order processing system, ensuring reliability and scalability even for operations that take extended periods to complete.
In the next section, we’ll dive into implementing robust retry logic and error handling in our workflows and activities.
Robust error handling and retry mechanisms are crucial for building resilient systems, especially in distributed environments. Temporal provides powerful built-in retry mechanisms, but it’s important to understand how to use them effectively and when to implement custom retry logic.
Temporal allows you to configure retry policies at both the workflow and activity level. Let’s update our workflow to include a more sophisticated retry policy:
func OrderWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderWorkflow started", "OrderID", order.ID) // Define a retry policy retryPolicy := &temporal.RetryPolicy{ InitialInterval: time.Second, BackoffCoefficient: 2.0, MaximumInterval: time.Minute, MaximumAttempts: 5, NonRetryableErrorTypes: []string{"InvalidOrderError"}, } // Activity options with retry policy activityOptions := workflow.ActivityOptions{ StartToCloseTimeout: time.Minute, RetryPolicy: retryPolicy, } ctx = workflow.WithActivityOptions(ctx, activityOptions) // Execute activities with retry policy err := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ValidateOrder, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return handleOrderError(ctx, "ValidateOrder", err, order) } // ... (other activities) return nil }
In this example, we’ve defined a retry policy that starts with a 1-second interval, doubles the interval with each retry (up to a maximum of 1 minute), and allows up to 5 attempts. We’ve also specified that errors of type “InvalidOrderError” should not be retried.
While Temporal’s built-in retry mechanisms are powerful, sometimes you need custom retry logic. Here’s an example of implementing custom retry logic for a payment processing activity:
func (a *OrderActivities) ProcessPaymentWithCustomRetry(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := activity.GetLogger(ctx) var err error for attempt := 1; attempt <= 3; attempt++ { err = a.processPayment(ctx, order) if err == nil { return nil } if _, ok := err.(*PaymentDeclinedError); ok { // Payment was declined, no point in retrying return err } logger.Info("Payment processing failed, retrying", "attempt", attempt, "error", err) time.Sleep(time.Duration(attempt) * time.Second) } return err } func (a *OrderActivities) processPayment(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { // Actual payment processing logic here // ... }
In this example, we implement a custom retry mechanism that attempts the payment processing up to 3 times, with an increasing delay between attempts. It also handles a specific error type (PaymentDeclinedError) differently, not retrying in that case.
Proper error handling is crucial for maintaining the integrity of our workflow. Let’s implement a helper function to handle errors in our workflow:
func handleOrderError(ctx workflow.Context, activityName string, err error, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Error("Activity failed", "activity", activityName, "orderID", order.ID, "error", err) // Depending on the activity and error type, we might want to compensate switch activityName { case "ProcessPayment": // If payment processing failed, we might need to cancel the order _ = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, CancelOrder, order).Get(ctx, nil) case "UpdateInventory": // If inventory update failed after payment, we might need to refund _ = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, RefundPayment, order).Get(ctx, nil) } // Create a customer-facing error message return workflow.NewCustomError("OrderProcessingFailed", "Failed to process order due to: "+err.Error()) }
This helper function logs the error, performs any necessary compensating actions, and returns a custom error that can be safely returned to the customer.
As your system evolves, you’ll need to update your workflow definitions. Temporal provides versioning capabilities that allow you to make changes to workflows without affecting running instances.
Here’s an example of how to implement versioning in our order processing workflow:
func OrderWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderWorkflow started", "OrderID", order.ID) // Use GetVersion to handle workflow versioning v := workflow.GetVersion(ctx, "OrderWorkflow.PaymentProcessing", workflow.DefaultVersion, 1) if v == workflow.DefaultVersion { // Old version: process payment before updating inventory err := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ProcessPayment, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return handleOrderError(ctx, "ProcessPayment", err, order) } err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.UpdateInventory, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return handleOrderError(ctx, "UpdateInventory", err, order) } } else { // New version: update inventory before processing payment err := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.UpdateInventory, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return handleOrderError(ctx, "UpdateInventory", err, order) } err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ProcessPayment, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return handleOrderError(ctx, "ProcessPayment", err, order) } } // ... rest of the workflow return nil }
In this example, we’ve used workflow.GetVersion to introduce a change in the order of operations. The new version updates inventory before processing payment, while the old version does the opposite. This allows us to gradually roll out the change without affecting running workflow instances.
When updating workflows in a production environment, consider the following strategies:
Incremental Changes : Make small, incremental changes rather than large overhauls. This makes it easier to manage versions and roll back if needed.
Compatibility Periods : Maintain compatibility with older versions for a certain period to allow running workflows to complete.
Feature Flags : Use feature flags in conjunction with workflow versions to control the rollout of new features.
Monitoring and Alerting : Set up monitoring and alerting for workflow versions to track the progress of updates and quickly identify any issues.
Rollback Plan : Always have a plan to roll back to the previous version if issues are detected with the new version.
By following these strategies and leveraging Temporal’s versioning capabilities, you can safely evolve your workflows over time without disrupting ongoing operations.
In the next section, we’ll explore how to implement the Saga pattern for managing distributed transactions in our order processing system.
The Saga pattern is a way to manage data consistency across microservices in distributed transaction scenarios. It’s particularly useful in our order processing system where we need to coordinate actions across multiple services (e.g., inventory, payment, shipping) and provide a mechanism for compensating actions if any step fails.
Let’s design a saga for our order processing system that includes the following steps:
If any of these steps fail, we need to execute compensating actions for the steps that have already completed.
Here’s how we can implement this saga using Temporal:
func OrderSaga(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderSaga started", "OrderID", order.ID) // Saga compensations var compensations []func(context.Context) error // Step 1: Reserve Inventory err := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ReserveInventory, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to reserve inventory: %w", err) } compensations = append(compensations, func(ctx context.Context) error { return a.ReleaseInventoryReservation(ctx, order) }) // Step 2: Process Payment err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ProcessPayment, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return compensate(ctx, compensations, fmt.Errorf("failed to process payment: %w", err)) } compensations = append(compensations, func(ctx context.Context) error { return a.RefundPayment(ctx, order) }) // Step 3: Update Inventory err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.UpdateInventory, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return compensate(ctx, compensations, fmt.Errorf("failed to update inventory: %w", err)) } // No compensation needed for this step, as we've already updated the inventory // Step 4: Arrange Shipping err = workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, a.ArrangeShipping, order).Get(ctx, nil) if err != nil { return compensate(ctx, compensations, fmt.Errorf("failed to arrange shipping: %w", err)) } logger.Info("OrderSaga completed successfully", "OrderID", order.ID) return nil } func compensate(ctx workflow.Context, compensations []func(context.Context) error, err error) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Error("Saga failed, executing compensations", "error", err) for i := len(compensations) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { compensationErr := workflow.ExecuteActivity(ctx, compensations[i]).Get(ctx, nil) if compensationErr != nil { logger.Error("Compensation failed", "error", compensationErr) // In a real-world scenario, you might want to implement more sophisticated // error handling for failed compensations, such as retrying or alerting } } return err }
In this implementation, we execute each step of the order process as an activity. After each successful step, we add a compensating action to a slice. If any step fails, we call the compensate function, which executes all the compensating actions in reverse order.
This approach ensures that we maintain data consistency across our distributed system, even in the face of failures.
Effective monitoring and observability are crucial for operating Temporal workflows in production. Let’s explore how to implement comprehensive monitoring for our order processing system.
Temporal provides built-in metrics, but we can also implement custom metrics for our specific use cases. Here’s an example of how to add custom metrics to our workflow:
func OrderWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderWorkflow started", "OrderID", order.ID) // Define metric orderProcessingTime := workflow.NewTimer(ctx, 0) defer func() { duration := orderProcessingTime.ElapsedTime() workflow.GetMetricsHandler(ctx).Timer("order_processing_time").Record(duration) }() // ... rest of the workflow implementation return nil }
In this example, we’re recording the total time taken to process an order.
To integrate with Prometheus, we need to expose our metrics. Here’s how we can set up a Prometheus endpoint in our main application:
package main import ( "net/http" "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp" "go.temporal.io/sdk/client" "go.temporal.io/sdk/worker" ) func main() { // ... Temporal client setup // Create a worker w := worker.New(c, "order-processing-task-queue", worker.Options{}) // Register workflows and activities w.RegisterWorkflow(OrderWorkflow) w.RegisterActivity(a.ValidateOrder) // ... register other activities // Start the worker go func() { err := w.Run(worker.InterruptCh()) if err != nil { logger.Fatal("Unable to start worker", err) } }() // Expose Prometheus metrics http.Handle("/metrics", promhttp.Handler()) go func() { err := http.ListenAndServe(":2112", nil) if err != nil { logger.Fatal("Unable to start metrics server", err) } }() // ... rest of your application }
This sets up a /metrics endpoint that Prometheus can scrape to collect our custom metrics along with the built-in Temporal metrics.
Structured logging can greatly improve the observability of our system. Let’s update our workflow to use structured logging:
func OrderWorkflow(ctx workflow.Context, order db.Order) error { logger := workflow.GetLogger(ctx) logger.Info("OrderWorkflow started", "OrderID", order.ID, "CustomerID", order.CustomerID, "TotalAmount", order.TotalAmount, ) // ... workflow implementation logger.Info("OrderWorkflow completed", "OrderID", order.ID, "Duration", workflow.Now(ctx).Sub(workflow.GetInfo(ctx).WorkflowStartTime), ) return nil }
This approach makes it easier to search and analyze logs, especially when aggregating logs from multiple services.
Distributed tracing can provide valuable insights into the flow of requests through our system. While Temporal doesn’t natively support distributed tracing, we can implement it in our activities:
import ( "go.opentelemetry.io/otel" "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace" ) func (a *OrderActivities) ProcessPayment(ctx context.Context, order db.Order) error { _, span := otel.Tracer("order-processing").Start(ctx, "ProcessPayment") defer span.End() span.SetAttributes( attribute.Int64("order.id", order.ID), attribute.Float64("order.amount", order.TotalAmount), ) // ... payment processing logic return nil }
By implementing distributed tracing, we can track the entire lifecycle of an order across multiple services and activities.
Thorough testing is crucial for ensuring the reliability of our Temporal workflows. Let’s explore some strategies for testing our order processing system.
Temporal provides a testing framework that allows us to unit test workflows. Here’s an example of how to test our OrderWorkflow:
func TestOrderWorkflow(t *testing.T) { testSuite := &testsuite.WorkflowTestSuite{} env := testSuite.NewTestWorkflowEnvironment() // Mock activities env.OnActivity(a.ValidateOrder, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) env.OnActivity(a.ProcessPayment, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) env.OnActivity(a.UpdateInventory, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) env.OnActivity(a.ArrangeShipping, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) // Execute workflow env.ExecuteWorkflow(OrderWorkflow, db.Order{ID: 1, CustomerID: 100, TotalAmount: 99.99}) require.True(t, env.IsWorkflowCompleted()) require.NoError(t, env.GetWorkflowError()) }
This test sets up a test environment, mocks the activities, and verifies that the workflow completes successfully.
It’s important to test that our saga compensations work correctly. Here’s an example test:
func TestOrderSagaCompensation(t *testing.T) { testSuite := &testsuite.WorkflowTestSuite{} env := testSuite.NewTestWorkflowEnvironment() // Mock activities env.OnActivity(a.ReserveInventory, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) env.OnActivity(a.ProcessPayment, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(errors.New("payment failed")) env.OnActivity(a.ReleaseInventoryReservation, mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil) // Execute workflow env.ExecuteWorkflow(OrderSaga, db.Order{ID: 1, CustomerID: 100, TotalAmount: 99.99}) require.True(t, env.IsWorkflowCompleted()) require.Error(t, env.GetWorkflowError()) // Verify that compensation was called env.AssertExpectations(t) }
This test verifies that when the payment processing fails, the inventory reservation is released as part of the compensation.
Lorsque nous mettons en œuvre et exploitons notre système avancé de traitement des commandes, il y a plusieurs défis et considérations à garder à l'esprit :
Complexité des flux de travail : À mesure que les flux de travail deviennent plus complexes, ils peuvent devenir difficiles à comprendre et à maintenir. Une refactorisation régulière et une bonne documentation sont cruciales.
Test des workflows de longue durée : tester des workflows qui peuvent s'exécuter pendant des jours ou des semaines peut être difficile. Pensez à mettre en place des mécanismes pour accélérer le temps de vos tests.
Gestion des dépendances externes : Les services externes peuvent échouer ou devenir indisponibles. Mettez en œuvre des disjoncteurs et des mécanismes de secours pour gérer ces scénarios.
Surveillance et alertes : configurez une surveillance et des alertes complètes pour identifier et répondre rapidement aux problèmes dans vos flux de travail.
Cohérence des données : assurez-vous que vos implémentations de saga maintiennent la cohérence des données entre les services, même en cas de pannes.
Réglage des performances : à mesure que votre système évolue, vous devrez peut-être ajuster les paramètres de performances de Temporal, tels que le nombre de travailleurs de flux de travail et d'activité.
Gestion des versions du workflow : gérez soigneusement les versions du workflow pour garantir des mises à jour fluides sans interrompre les instances en cours d'exécution.
Dans cet article, nous avons approfondi les concepts avancés de flux de travail temporel, en mettant en œuvre une logique de traitement de commande complexe, des modèles de saga et une gestion robuste des erreurs. Nous avons également abordé les stratégies de surveillance, d'observabilité et de test pour nos flux de travail.
Dans la prochaine partie de notre série, nous nous concentrerons sur les opérations avancées de base de données avec sqlc. Nous couvrirons :
Restez à l'écoute pendant que nous continuons à développer notre système sophistiqué de traitement des commandes !
Êtes-vous confronté à des problèmes difficiles ou avez-vous besoin d'un point de vue externe sur une nouvelle idée ou un nouveau projet ? Je peux aider ! Que vous cherchiez à établir une preuve de concept technologique avant de réaliser un investissement plus important ou que vous ayez besoin de conseils sur des problèmes difficiles, je suis là pour vous aider.
Si vous souhaitez travailler avec moi, veuillez nous contacter par e-mail à hungaikevin@gmail.com.
Transformons vos défis en opportunités !
Atas ialah kandungan terperinci Melaksanakan Sistem Pemprosesan Pesanan: Bahagian Aliran Kerja Temporal Lanjutan. Untuk maklumat lanjut, sila ikut artikel berkaitan lain di laman web China PHP!